The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well?
Page:
The "It's a kind of magic" album proves you wrong.
Paradox: wrote:
> No, Queen are classic rock.
If classic means awful then yes.
> No, Queen are classic rock.
If classic means awful then yes.
gimo80 wrote:
> Stairway to Bed wrote:
> Queen are punk rock, right? so punk is better
>
> Yeah, the Sex Pistols and Queen are SO alike.
>
> *tuts*
Well, at-least one person from each band is dead.
> Stairway to Bed wrote:
> Queen are punk rock, right? so punk is better
>
> Yeah, the Sex Pistols and Queen are SO alike.
>
> *tuts*
Well, at-least one person from each band is dead.
Paradox: wrote:
>
>
> Sure, hearing song after angsty song about your ex-girlfriend who you
> were deeply in love with but she broke your heart and now you're mad
> at your dad is really damn fine music.
No, like all kinds of music thats the more advertised, commercial end of the market - skinny american college boys who all sound the same. However, for every ten bands like this, you find a Brand New or a Dashboard Confessional. It's like how many metal bands would you say are amazing? Then compare that number to the vast number of wannabe metal bands that suck and taint the name of the music altogether? Same thing as marginalising emo like that.
>
>
> Sure, hearing song after angsty song about your ex-girlfriend who you
> were deeply in love with but she broke your heart and now you're mad
> at your dad is really damn fine music.
No, like all kinds of music thats the more advertised, commercial end of the market - skinny american college boys who all sound the same. However, for every ten bands like this, you find a Brand New or a Dashboard Confessional. It's like how many metal bands would you say are amazing? Then compare that number to the vast number of wannabe metal bands that suck and taint the name of the music altogether? Same thing as marginalising emo like that.
Stairway to Bed wrote:
> Queen are punk rock, right? so punk is better
Yeah, the Sex Pistols and Queen are SO alike.
*tuts*
> Queen are punk rock, right? so punk is better
Yeah, the Sex Pistols and Queen are SO alike.
*tuts*
> Stairway to Bed
:D
:D
No, Queen are classic rock.
RoJ wrote:
> AFAIAC, there are too many damn sub-genres. But pray continue,
> interesting discussion going on.
I think we about exhausted it.
> AFAIAC, there are too many damn sub-genres. But pray continue,
> interesting discussion going on.
I think we about exhausted it.
Very_Metal wrote:
> you're right RoJ, there are far too many pigeon holes and sub genres,
> mags like Kerrap! invent them to add elitism to their
> band-of-the-moment.
Kerrap? Oh, right, I get it...
> you're right RoJ, there are far too many pigeon holes and sub genres,
> mags like Kerrap! invent them to add elitism to their
> band-of-the-moment.
Kerrap? Oh, right, I get it...
you're right RoJ, there are far too many pigeon holes and sub genres, mags like Kerrap! invent them to add elitism to their band-of-the-moment.
Page: