The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://nodq.com/news/125256671.shtml[/URL]
so that's the end of highlighting what makes the cruisers so interesting then.
if he doesn't like the little guys doing flashy moves, then i have a sinking feeling for Burchill.
so that's the end of highlighting what makes the cruisers so interesting then.
if he doesn't like the little guys doing flashy moves, then i have a sinking feeling for Burchill.
Page:
[URL]http://nodq.com/news/125256671.shtml[/URL]
so that's the end of highlighting what makes the cruisers so interesting then.
if he doesn't like the little guys doing flashy moves, then i have a sinking feeling for Burchill.
so that's the end of highlighting what makes the cruisers so interesting then.
if he doesn't like the little guys doing flashy moves, then i have a sinking feeling for Burchill.
A cruiserweight division without high risk moves? So basically nothing like a cruiserweight division then.
I can see Juvi doing the moves anyway and getting fired soon :-D
I can see Juvi doing the moves anyway and getting fired soon :-D
Im sure the same thing was said to other guys a while back, but thier moves have crept back in.
eg. Kurt Angles overhead suplex, Kane/Undertaker tombstone, big back body drop and a few others.
I remember Kane/Taker stopped using the tombstone a while ago, but theyve been doing it alot recently havent they?
Either way... I couldnt give a crap, farley.
eg. Kurt Angles overhead suplex, Kane/Undertaker tombstone, big back body drop and a few others.
I remember Kane/Taker stopped using the tombstone a while ago, but theyve been doing it alot recently havent they?
Either way... I couldnt give a crap, farley.
they use the tombstone for effect now, not quite shock value, but when they need to look as though they're really intent on doing damage.
Just another reason for serious wrestling fans to switch over to TNA.
I'm looking forward to the day that TNA beats WWE in the ratings. It's not as far away as WWE management would have you believe.
I'm looking forward to the day that TNA beats WWE in the ratings. It's not as far away as WWE management would have you believe.
I wonder if JR will be bringing that up on RAW :-D Speaking of which very strange that after that week of him crowing about the ratings on RAW he hasn't mentioned them again since, couldn't be because they're crap could it?
Yeah, a slight shift in TNA's pushing policy and this TV deal could really give WWE something to think about. TNA have the initiative in that they are chasing the WWE, meaning they will take more risks. The WWE are playing it safe and that is, in essence, sucking the fun out of it.
Grandprix wrote:
> Yeah, a slight shift in TNA's pushing policy
What would you like to see changed?
I think TNA have a very clear policy at the moment.
> Yeah, a slight shift in TNA's pushing policy
What would you like to see changed?
I think TNA have a very clear policy at the moment.
Perhaps a bit less Jarrett pushing and less pushing of talentless rejects. It may have changed recently, I haven't been keeping up, although I've heard that Jarrett is going to be the focus of TNA when they go to Spike TV.
Seems strange that everytime the WWE makes a success of something they ruin it - ECW One Night Stand was a huge success because of all the high flying moves etc and now Vince wants to stop cruiserweights doing these moves which gets rid of most of their match!
Page: