The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Liverpool vs. Olypiakos on Five. Who normally presents Five's football coverage? The uterly useless John Barnes of course, but to my pleasant surprise he's not there. I'm not actually sure who the new bloke is but I recognise his voice from somewhere and he's better than John, not that that's saying much.
At the start of the programme he said, "Life's full of surprises, your TV guide will have said that tonights programme would be presented by John Barnes but he's not here, I am." They didn't say he's ill, they didn't say he had other commitments, just that he wasn't there. Hopefully because he's been fired.
At the start of the programme he said, "Life's full of surprises, your TV guide will have said that tonights programme would be presented by John Barnes but he's not here, I am." They didn't say he's ill, they didn't say he had other commitments, just that he wasn't there. Hopefully because he's been fired.
Page:
Stryke wrote:
> Blah blah Smithy deserves to be shot in the spleen, Leeds forever,
> down with money etc etc
>
> Sing us a new one :)
:-D
> Blah blah Smithy deserves to be shot in the spleen, Leeds forever,
> down with money etc etc
>
> Sing us a new one :)
:-D
Blah blah Smithy deserves to be shot in the spleen, Leeds forever, down with money etc etc
Sing us a new one :)
Sing us a new one :)
Stryke wrote:
> Yeah, right. Works so well at Man Utd, they're having to convert Alan
> Smith (who I admire) to a holding midfielder.
And to think, I loved you.
> Yeah, right. Works so well at Man Utd, they're having to convert Alan
> Smith (who I admire) to a holding midfielder.
And to think, I loved you.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
>
> He was fairly impressive actually. Maybe 4 quality strikers can work?
--
Yeah, right. Works so well at Man Utd, they're having to convert Alan Smith (who I admire) to a holding midfielder.
Even when Baros goes, one of the three is bound to be unhappy. The only one who would be content for a while with starting on the bench is Crouch, and he's the one who's going to start for some unexplicable Hispanic reason.
>
> He was fairly impressive actually. Maybe 4 quality strikers can work?
--
Yeah, right. Works so well at Man Utd, they're having to convert Alan Smith (who I admire) to a holding midfielder.
Even when Baros goes, one of the three is bound to be unhappy. The only one who would be content for a while with starting on the bench is Crouch, and he's the one who's going to start for some unexplicable Hispanic reason.
Stryke wrote:
> That game shows what Baros can do. He took them apart practically on
> his own, and none of you can deny that.
Fair play, his assist for Morientes was class.
> Crouch wasn't bad either, but it was Milan's match.
He was fairly impressive actually. Maybe 4 quality strikers can work?
> That game shows what Baros can do. He took them apart practically on
> his own, and none of you can deny that.
Fair play, his assist for Morientes was class.
> Crouch wasn't bad either, but it was Milan's match.
He was fairly impressive actually. Maybe 4 quality strikers can work?
That game shows what Baros can do. He took them apart practically on his own, and none of you can deny that.
Crouch wasn't bad either, but it was Milan's match.
Crouch wasn't bad either, but it was Milan's match.
Blank wrote:
> Also, they said John Barnes will be back.
Nooooooooo! Why would they want him back? Don't they realise that everybody hates him?
> Also, they said John Barnes will be back.
Nooooooooo! Why would they want him back? Don't they realise that everybody hates him?
I think Morientes then two from Baros.
Also, they said John Barnes will be back.
Also, they said John Barnes will be back.
Only caught the first half tonight, who scored Liverpool's last three?
John barnes, howeer, does not
Page: