The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp?pagetypeid=2&articleid=36432&subsectionid=1585[/URL]
$400 and it will cost them $494 to make each console. :S
$400 and it will cost them $494 to make each console. :S
Page:
I'm so glad i brought this Thread back to life, its giving everyone something to talk about.
I must be an internet saint or something.
I must be an internet saint or something.
I've decided that I wont be getting the Xbox 360 on launch anymore. If I do get one on launch I wont be able to afford many games for it and my PSP.
I think i'll get the 360 during January sales or sometime near there.
I think i'll get the 360 during January sales or sometime near there.
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> To be honest, I don't think i'll be the only one either,
> £400-£450 is way too much for a games console.
That sounds like the likely price.
> Sony have also said that they expect the price of the PS3 to be fixed
> for quite some time, but I suspect that will all depend on how things
> go with the 360.
It does, Sony might end up giving it and making a larger loss to compete with Microsoft. They've pretty much done the same with the PSP because of the DS competition.
Nintendo releasing that has seriously damaged Sony's plans and it looks unlikely that the PSP can make a viable profit at its low price and new competition in the market.
> AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> To be honest, I don't think i'll be the only one either,
> £400-£450 is way too much for a games console.
That sounds like the likely price.
> Sony have also said that they expect the price of the PS3 to be fixed
> for quite some time, but I suspect that will all depend on how things
> go with the 360.
It does, Sony might end up giving it and making a larger loss to compete with Microsoft. They've pretty much done the same with the PSP because of the DS competition.
Nintendo releasing that has seriously damaged Sony's plans and it looks unlikely that the PSP can make a viable profit at its low price and new competition in the market.
It's not that difficult to understand?
In simple terms the PS3 will have a 3.2 GHz processor, therefore it requires double that capacity in order to run an Xbox 360 Emulator at realish speed.
In simple terms the PS3 will have a 3.2 GHz processor, therefore it requires double that capacity in order to run an Xbox 360 Emulator at realish speed.
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> If you were going to emulate a 360, you'd need a processor of at least
> 6Ghz, and there's no such thing at the moment.
*nods pretending he knows what their talking about*
> If you were going to emulate a 360, you'd need a processor of at least
> 6Ghz, and there's no such thing at the moment.
*nods pretending he knows what their talking about*
If you were going to emulate a 360, you'd need a processor of at least 6Ghz, and there's no such thing at the moment.
You always need loads more power than the original machine to run an emulator of it.
Oh.
How not?
How not?
down wrote:
> Wookiee - You said they were in the process of creating an XBox 360
> emulator for the PS3?
>
> Got any links?
Nope. I was joking.
The PS3 is powerful, but it's not that powerful!
> Wookiee - You said they were in the process of creating an XBox 360
> emulator for the PS3?
>
> Got any links?
Nope. I was joking.
The PS3 is powerful, but it's not that powerful!
J Nash wrote:
> No.
He's right.
You won't be able to play PC games on the 360.
> No.
He's right.
You won't be able to play PC games on the 360.
Page: