The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
a) lying
b) hasn't played it
c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
I thought it was excellent.
> It is a very good game. Anyone who says otherwise is either
>
> a) lying
What reason have I to lie? I would hardly try to look cool on an internet forum full of people I don't know.
> b) hasn't played it
Again, see my response for a)
> c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
>
Again, see my response to a)
> Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's
> bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
No, it's generic. So far the only major difference I've experienced is being able to gain stamina, being able to ride a bicycle and the graphics and sound effects being really really crap.
I enjoyed GTA 3 and to some extent Vice City. But so far, I have not felt any compulsion to carry on with San Andreas. Really really poor.
Look how stupid they are :P