The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'.
In the voice of that guy from Little Britain: I don't like it.
Page:
In the voice of that guy from Little Britain: I don't like it.
lol, i dident for a bit but now ive got into it
Well I tried it, gave it an hour, and was utterly appauled by the repeated gameplay of the first two games, the crap quality of sounds (like listening to Game Boy Advance) and the absolutely crap graphics. IGN and other media were threatened to sing its praises. I am now certain of it.
It is a very good game. Anyone who says otherwise is either
a) lying
b) hasn't played it
c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
a) lying
b) hasn't played it
c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
I was playing it at my friend's house earlier.
I thought it was excellent.
I thought it was excellent.
Reefer wrote:
> It is a very good game. Anyone who says otherwise is either
>
> a) lying
What reason have I to lie? I would hardly try to look cool on an internet forum full of people I don't know.
> b) hasn't played it
Again, see my response for a)
> c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
>
Again, see my response to a)
> Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's
> bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
No, it's generic. So far the only major difference I've experienced is being able to gain stamina, being able to ride a bicycle and the graphics and sound effects being really really crap.
I enjoyed GTA 3 and to some extent Vice City. But so far, I have not felt any compulsion to carry on with San Andreas. Really really poor.
> It is a very good game. Anyone who says otherwise is either
>
> a) lying
What reason have I to lie? I would hardly try to look cool on an internet forum full of people I don't know.
> b) hasn't played it
Again, see my response for a)
> c) is saying it to sound "cool" or "different".
>
Again, see my response to a)
> Granted, the graphics can be cack here and there, but as a game, it's
> bloody better than 99% of the games churned out.
No, it's generic. So far the only major difference I've experienced is being able to gain stamina, being able to ride a bicycle and the graphics and sound effects being really really crap.
I enjoyed GTA 3 and to some extent Vice City. But so far, I have not felt any compulsion to carry on with San Andreas. Really really poor.
Well, I disagree wholeheartedly, as do the vast majority, it appears. Doesn't make you wrong, because all everything is is opinion, but just grossly outnumbered :0D
The vast majority of Americans voted Bush in as President for the next 4 years.
Look how stupid they are :P
Look how stupid they are :P
You forgot option D - a complete and utter fanboy stating an opinion differing from the general consensus in a bid to appear controversial.
A fanboy to what Azul?
Page: