The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4540939.stm[/URL]
I have a feeling a £790 million takeover is on the cards and United might just accept it.
Discuss.
I have a feeling a £790 million takeover is on the cards and United might just accept it.
Discuss.
Page:
or†ega wrote:
> United wont be a PLC once Glazer takes united off the stock market.
Good point. But still van't really bring myself to care about the fate of club when it's their own fault...
> United wont be a PLC once Glazer takes united off the stock market.
Good point. But still van't really bring myself to care about the fate of club when it's their own fault...
Well i know one thing for sure.. My dad wont be selling his shares.. As i want them when he dies :D
EDIT: As spelt Know wrong :(
EDIT: As spelt Know wrong :(
Cong_Man wrote:
> I wouldn't be so sure. There are rules in place which stop even a
> single owner siphoning money from a PLC.
United wont be a PLC once Glazer takes united off the stock market.
> I wouldn't be so sure. There are rules in place which stop even a
> single owner siphoning money from a PLC.
United wont be a PLC once Glazer takes united off the stock market.
yeah, less show of support wont help the team morale
Damarus wrote:
> The fact that Man U will lose nearly 50 million a year to make up the
> debt for one.
I wouldn't be so sure. There are rules in place which stop even a single owner siphoning money from a PLC.
> The fact that Man U will lose nearly 50 million a year to make up the
> debt for one.
I wouldn't be so sure. There are rules in place which stop even a single owner siphoning money from a PLC.
Theres a big difference. The board of directors all had to agree with each other before any major decisions went through, but now with Glazer in total control he can get rid of the board and do as he pleases.
On another note i dont see the point in demonstrations at the FA cup final, just concentrate on supporting the team so they have the best chance of beating arsenal eh lads?
On another note i dont see the point in demonstrations at the FA cup final, just concentrate on supporting the team so they have the best chance of beating arsenal eh lads?
The fact that Man U will lose nearly 50 million a year to make up the debt for one.
Heh. Why do Man Yoo think this is a bad thing?
All of a sudden you're owner by one man who loves money and doesn't care about the club. Whereas before you were owned by several men who loved the money and didn't care about the club (the fact that they sold up when money was waved under their noses proves this). So what's the difference, eh?
All of a sudden you're owner by one man who loves money and doesn't care about the club. Whereas before you were owned by several men who loved the money and didn't care about the club (the fact that they sold up when money was waved under their noses proves this). So what's the difference, eh?
Glazer has secured 75% ownership of United and can now do what he likes with us.
On a brighter note Giggs has signed a new 2 yr contract, United breaking their own rules by stating they will only offer 1 yr deals to players over the age of 30 - anyone think Glazer had something to do with that?
On a brighter note Giggs has signed a new 2 yr contract, United breaking their own rules by stating they will only offer 1 yr deals to players over the age of 30 - anyone think Glazer had something to do with that?
Why would you care anyway? You can still call it Old Trafford, it's just that Glazer will be getting millions for Nike to say 'IT'S OURS NOW'
Page: