The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
3 was quite boring IMHO
> 2...
>
> What?
This dude speaks truth. Yuss. But in terms of GC, 3 is better than 4.
> The cruise ship was a good one, but 3 had some really rubbish levels
> too. On the subject of nothing to do, Los Angeles was appalling.
The level where you could cause an earthquake?
> Does any of them have 4 player splitscreen?
1, 2, 3, 4 and Underground don't. I'm not sure about Undergound 2.
> And what did 2 have that 4 didn't?
>
> 4 improved on it in every way. Better level design, smoother control
> system and engine, better graphics, more interesting goals, no time
> limit, reverts, spine transfers, pro challenges, customisation...
But 2 was just incredibly enjoyable. What is all that if it's not as enjoyable?
> 4 captured the very essence of the Tony Hawk's series.
No. That's still 2 for me :P
4 improved on it in every way. Better level design, smoother control system and engine, better graphics, more interesting goals, no time limit, reverts, spine transfers, pro challenges, customisation...
4 captured the very essence of the Tony Hawk's series.