Viewing Thread:
"5 players to revive United..."

According to Stam and Nedved, these 5 players are what Man Yoo need to revive themselves...

Iker Casillas

Likely Cost : £5M

Ledley King

Likely Cost : £10M

Gattuso

Likely Cost : £15M

Michael Essien

Likely Cost : £12M

Defoe

Likely Cost : £13M



Well, I agree with almost everything...well, everything really. Here are a list of players Yoo are almost definately getting rid of:

Van Nistelrooy - £20M
Saha - £5M
Kleberson - £4M
Fortune - £3M
Neville - £2.5M
Liam Miller - 1M
Ricardo - 500k

Thats a total of £36 Million!

Who agrees with them?

(Got this info from The Nuts if anyone wants to know)

EDIT| An interesting fact as well : Former Yoo player Diego Forlan has scored more goals for Villareal than Ruud and Rooney put together this season!

HA!

Man utd wont av any money 2 spent dis year!!! n even liverpool will end up above dem nxt year if they cant buy!!!!!!!

Thing is I don't think Manchester United will be able to spend big at all now that Glazer is here. He's no Abramovich.

Nor do I see Gattuso moving to Man U either. He'll stay in Italy. Sound guy mind, I was vaguely acquainted with him when he played for Rangers. Ah, the good old days.

I think Fletcher will take over from Scholes eventually.

or†ega wrote:

> He's not a winger anyway, he's a centre mid, might not be good enough
> to play in the 442 but is very well suited playing alongside keane and
> scholes.

I was talking about Richardson not Fletcher. Richardson most definitely is a wide man or attacker.

Fletcher is class. Had another top game today and was unlucky to be subbed.

Won the ball in midfield on many occasions.

He's not a winger anyway, he's a centre mid, might not be good enough to play in the 442 but is very well suited playing alongside keane and scholes.

or†ega wrote:
> Both scored today :P

I still think Fletcher's crap. Richardson is showing signs, but I can't see him being the next "one". Certainly not going to replace your current 2 wide men.

Mav wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> But of course grammatically, it does.
>
> Well, that depends on what it means.
>
> Either it's the league of champions, or a league owned by champions.

Not so much owned, but it's a possessive sense.

Clazon wrote:
I still think Fletcher
> and Richardson are crap.

Both scored today :P

Mav wrote:
> Well, that depends on what it means.
>
> Either it's the league of champions, or a league owned by champions.

Its actually neither becasue the inclusion of teams that finish 2nd,3rd,4th... :D