Viewing Thread:
"Official Notable Election: 12/05/05"

Yes, I know there's some other election happening today, but coming this time next week is the vote that can really make a difference to people's lives - UKchatforums.com Notable.

Every three months the regulars of the board vote to give one member "Notable" status. The colour of their name (which is changed to Gold) and their member title is the only difference that you'll see, but the increased fear and respect from their peers will be obvious to all.

The vote will be held on Thursday 12th May. There will be an official voting thread put up in General Chat on Thursday morning, and you'll get until midnight to place your vote. Unfortunately JATs and Newbies are unable to vote, this will be for Regulars and Notables only.

This time round, as well as your normal vote for Notable, you'll also be able to vote for someone to relinquish their Notable status and rejoin the ranks of the Regulars. Use it wisely.

So next Thursday then. Don't forget it.

Celestine wrote:
> Whoever won that
> election anyways?

I won it because everyone loves me.

Dispense with this "no table" election. I say we have tables! And lots of them!

Also I already won the forum general election, which means I am the president of the forums already and should actually be made the new notable.

CandyFloss wrote:
> Cweek wrote:
> We could vote for the same person with both votes. Making someone a
> notable and then a regular, or vice versa.
>
> But it would be rather pointless.
>
> and it wouldn't work. If you voted someone as notable then it would
> mean they are currently a regular, which means you wouldn't be able
> to vote them back to a regular since they would already be a regular,
> or vice versa.

Really depends on which they count first.

We could have a new notable for 25 minutes before they're back to a reg.

Celestine wrote:
> CandyFloss wrote:
> Cweek wrote:
> We could vote for the same person with both votes. Making someone a
> notable and then a regular, or vice versa.
>
> But it would be rather pointless.
>
> and it wouldn't work. If you voted someone as notable then it would
> mean they are currently a regular, which means you wouldn't be able
> to vote them back to a regular since they would already be a
> regular,
> or vice versa.
>
> Tell 'em girrrl!! :D
>
> If it's just one vote, I'm voting for Lori. *mwah*
>
> Vote "For the Birds!!!" Hehe. :P Whoever won that
> election anyways?

That's 2 votes already..keep 'em coming

Maybe next time, eh s2pid?

Just don't turn into a spammer. We don't need anymore.

CandyFloss wrote:
> Cweek wrote:
> We could vote for the same person with both votes. Making someone a
> notable and then a regular, or vice versa.
>
> But it would be rather pointless.
>
> and it wouldn't work. If you voted someone as notable then it would
> mean they are currently a regular, which means you wouldn't be able
> to vote them back to a regular since they would already be a regular,
> or vice versa.

Tell 'em girrrl!! :D

If it's just one vote, I'm voting for Lori. *mwah*

Vote "For the Birds!!!" Hehe. :P Whoever won that election anyways?

dammit can't vote.

Nooooo! My brain's exploded! I'm trying to concentrate on stage 8 of that puzzle thing...

Cweek wrote:
> We could vote for the same person with both votes. Making someone a
> notable and then a regular, or vice versa.
>
> But it would be rather pointless.

and it wouldn't work. If you voted someone as notable then it would mean they are currently a regular, which means you wouldn't be able to vote them back to a regular since they would already be a regular, or vice versa.

Sorry. I don't think that's possible.

Unless you're talking about me. I'm a Newbie at heart. Or so people insult me by.

Cweek wrote:
> We could vote for the same person with both votes. Making someone a
> notable and then a regular, or vice versa.
>
> But it would be rather pointless.

I like it.

It could be the new apathy vote.... well ... almost.