The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Taken from IMDB.com
Pop star Justin Timberlake will star alongside real-life girlfriend Cameron Diaz in Shrek 3 as the voice of one of the animated characters. The singer is lending his vocal talents to the role of the young King Arthur in the fantasy feature, which also sees Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers returning to play Donkey and lovable ogre Shrek respectively. And producer Aron Warner has quashed rumors that screen beauty Diaz, who plays Princess Fiona, persuaded him to cast Timberlake - claiming the young pop star was just right for the part. He says, "Our desire was to get somebody who is visible and had their own persona to bring to the table. Justin fit the bill perfectly." Timberlake has already appeared in the cartoon franchise - in Shrek 2, a poster of "Sir Justin" on the wall of Princess Fiona's bedroom flashes across the screen.
_________________________________________
The first film was excellent. The second was poor. The third will be dire. And I hear there'll be four.
I'd much rather they'd spend time on writing than signing big name celebrities. Or better yet, move on from Shrek and create something new. What ever happened to that Kung-Fu Panda film they were making?
Pop star Justin Timberlake will star alongside real-life girlfriend Cameron Diaz in Shrek 3 as the voice of one of the animated characters. The singer is lending his vocal talents to the role of the young King Arthur in the fantasy feature, which also sees Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers returning to play Donkey and lovable ogre Shrek respectively. And producer Aron Warner has quashed rumors that screen beauty Diaz, who plays Princess Fiona, persuaded him to cast Timberlake - claiming the young pop star was just right for the part. He says, "Our desire was to get somebody who is visible and had their own persona to bring to the table. Justin fit the bill perfectly." Timberlake has already appeared in the cartoon franchise - in Shrek 2, a poster of "Sir Justin" on the wall of Princess Fiona's bedroom flashes across the screen.
_________________________________________
The first film was excellent. The second was poor. The third will be dire. And I hear there'll be four.
I'd much rather they'd spend time on writing than signing big name celebrities. Or better yet, move on from Shrek and create something new. What ever happened to that Kung-Fu Panda film they were making?
Page:
Tphi wrote:
> Three will be overkill, Justin Timberlake will be the final nail in
> the coffin for me, and I hear there's a Puss in Boots spin-off as
> well. :S
Heard that on the radio today. Puss in Boots rocks. His eyes! He's the master of deception, that cat. Bleugh
Enjoyed the 2nd more than the 1st. Probably because it got away from the swamp [and surrounding areas etc..] and met more characters and it seemed to have more humour than the 1st. Puss in Boots just seemed to steal it [the heart, that is] and should've appeared more than he did. Going back to it after watching the 2nd is nice because it's a classic.
But yeah. Justin Timberlake will probably make it poop but then sometimes things like that turn out to be greater than expected.
> Three will be overkill, Justin Timberlake will be the final nail in
> the coffin for me, and I hear there's a Puss in Boots spin-off as
> well. :S
Heard that on the radio today. Puss in Boots rocks. His eyes! He's the master of deception, that cat. Bleugh
Enjoyed the 2nd more than the 1st. Probably because it got away from the swamp [and surrounding areas etc..] and met more characters and it seemed to have more humour than the 1st. Puss in Boots just seemed to steal it [the heart, that is] and should've appeared more than he did. Going back to it after watching the 2nd is nice because it's a classic.
But yeah. Justin Timberlake will probably make it poop but then sometimes things like that turn out to be greater than expected.
Whatever you say, bub.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie
> references, which kids just aren't going to get.
But most kids films have jokes they dont get in them, it's just something they do so that adults can enjoy the film too.
It's definately not aimed mostly at adults than kids.
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie
> references, which kids just aren't going to get.
But most kids films have jokes they dont get in them, it's just something they do so that adults can enjoy the film too.
It's definately not aimed mostly at adults than kids.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie
> references, which kids just aren't going to get.
> Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie
> references, which kids just aren't going to get.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Because kids won't understand half of the jokes in it.
Give me an example?
> Because kids won't understand half of the jokes in it.
Give me an example?
CDouch wrote:
> See that's what made the original so good. It was as much for adults
> as kids. I remember saying it was one of the first 'Family Films'
> that lived up to the title.
Yeh, but I diagree with FinalFantasyFanatic that it is mainly for adults.
> See that's what made the original so good. It was as much for adults
> as kids. I remember saying it was one of the first 'Family Films'
> that lived up to the title.
Yeh, but I diagree with FinalFantasyFanatic that it is mainly for adults.
Sexual innuendo, references from films aimed at adults, cast that adults were familiar with etc
Because kids won't understand half of the jokes in it.
Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie references, which kids just aren't going to get.
Like I said, it's basically a vehicle for strings of movie references, which kids just aren't going to get.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> I'd say it was mainly for adults, actually.
Why is that?
> I'd say it was mainly for adults, actually.
Why is that?
I'd say it was mainly for adults, actually.
Page: