The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> If there is one thing Bungie won't forget, it's DLC. They have to
> provide it to keep the game alive and when its as hyped as Halo 2 is
> they are bound to do it soon enough.
There's no doubt that the game'll get a she load of downloads.
This is the biggest game on Xbox Live period. I expect Microsoft'll keep it supported with regular downloads until Xbox 2.
Timesplitters: Future Perfect will apparently have a map editor though. Just one reason why that game rocks so much.
I expect more in downloadable content though.
I wasn't comparing the games in anyway at all.....
> ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Plus in terms of racing games, Burnout 3 was big. It had been
> anticipated long before release.
>
> Yes, still doesn't mean it deserved 9.5! By that logic, Halo 2 DOES
> deserve 9.8 from IGN!
Why bother trying to compare 2 different games that are from completely separate genres? Burnout 3 probably deserves that amount as it's a great racing game, the same going for Halo as it deserved to be a great First person shooter.
> Freedom Fighters scored 9.3 on Gamespot, Halo 2 got 9.4. Not that the
> score matters, it is the content of the review and what their opinion
> was rather than the overall score.
I apologise, I was mistaken - although to be honest, in terms of size/style/anticipation/etc, Halo 2 > FF, although I love FF to bits. And the score is effectively the summary of opinion - what else?
>
> Plus in terms of racing games, Burnout 3 was big. It had been
> anticipated long before release.
Yes, still doesn't mean it deserved 9.5! By that logic, Halo 2 DOES deserve 9.8 from IGN!