The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So who do you want to be the next Pope?
I just wanted to use the title. Bet it's been done a thousand times before anyway
I just wanted to use the title. Bet it's been done a thousand times before anyway
Page:
Stryke wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> >That's what I've gathered. Quite interesting. Of course, I'd
> post a
> more intellectual dissertation if this were in Life..
>
> --
>
> Oh, goody...
Indeed, I'll be there in a few.
> Celestine wrote:
> >That's what I've gathered. Quite interesting. Of course, I'd
> post a
> more intellectual dissertation if this were in Life..
>
> --
>
> Oh, goody...
Indeed, I'll be there in a few.
Light wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Well, I was saying something about black or white smoke a few posts
> ago, before the nonesense chimed in. Apologies to those who
> witnessed my lude comments, but some people really just need to lay
> off already. I'm always up for discussion on topics that I feel a
> passion for, this being one of them.
>
>
> Ever stop to think that others feel passion for views that oppose
> yours? And that they should no more "lay off" than you
> should douse your passion on the subject?
>
You're a fine example, Mr. Holier Than Thou.
>
> I disagreed with Mr. Thraves for posting this thread poking fun at
> the Papal seat for the sake of humour. I found it unbecoming of him
> to be fueling the fire of Pope ridicule around here. I thank him
> very much for the subsequent nolo contendere post he made with
> disclaimer. So I gave him a virtual hug...I love the guy, what can
> I
> say. Sue me.
>
> So...because you're a catholic, no-one should take the proverbial out
> of the papacy? I mean, you're welcome to register your distaste about
> it and all, but don't you think you're being...well, rather
> totalitarian minded?
I think..exactly what I said about it. *sighs* Now stop before I sprinkle you with Holy water.
> Celestine wrote:
> Well, I was saying something about black or white smoke a few posts
> ago, before the nonesense chimed in. Apologies to those who
> witnessed my lude comments, but some people really just need to lay
> off already. I'm always up for discussion on topics that I feel a
> passion for, this being one of them.
>
>
> Ever stop to think that others feel passion for views that oppose
> yours? And that they should no more "lay off" than you
> should douse your passion on the subject?
>
You're a fine example, Mr. Holier Than Thou.
>
> I disagreed with Mr. Thraves for posting this thread poking fun at
> the Papal seat for the sake of humour. I found it unbecoming of him
> to be fueling the fire of Pope ridicule around here. I thank him
> very much for the subsequent nolo contendere post he made with
> disclaimer. So I gave him a virtual hug...I love the guy, what can
> I
> say. Sue me.
>
> So...because you're a catholic, no-one should take the proverbial out
> of the papacy? I mean, you're welcome to register your distaste about
> it and all, but don't you think you're being...well, rather
> totalitarian minded?
I think..exactly what I said about it. *sighs* Now stop before I sprinkle you with Holy water.
Celestine wrote:
> You're a fine example, Mr. Holier Than Thou.
That was a magnificent...avoidance of the question. If you want to slate me, be my guest. But answer the question.
> I think..exactly what I said about it. *sighs* Now stop before I
> sprinkle you with Holy water.
I'll stop once you quit coming up with various pieces of anodyne sentiment to avoid addressing that you don't want to answer, whilst demanding everyone else abide by your rules in debate.
> You're a fine example, Mr. Holier Than Thou.
That was a magnificent...avoidance of the question. If you want to slate me, be my guest. But answer the question.
> I think..exactly what I said about it. *sighs* Now stop before I
> sprinkle you with Holy water.
I'll stop once you quit coming up with various pieces of anodyne sentiment to avoid addressing that you don't want to answer, whilst demanding everyone else abide by your rules in debate.
I think Kilgore should be the next pope. It'd add to his already huge list of things to do, so he'd be able to do it. Plus, he'd get a new hat.
Light wrote:
> Ever stop to think that others feel passion for views that oppose
> yours?
Yes. Why will you not allow me mine?
> And that they should no more "lay off" than you
> should douse your passion on the subject?
>
Yes. You should. Or, I'll douse you with this Holy water already.
> So...because you're a catholic, no-one should take the proverbial out
> of the papacy?
What I viewed as Mr. Thraves subjecting the Papacy to ridicule was truly unbecoming of his just nature. Apparently, it wasn't his intent. I'm almost positive the Catholic soon-to-be Mrs. Light would have similar views of you and subjugate as you fumble your integrity with your pride.
> I mean, you're welcome to register your distaste about
> it and all, but don't you think you're being...well, rather
> totalitarian minded?
I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that. I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my opinion about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
[edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
> Ever stop to think that others feel passion for views that oppose
> yours?
Yes. Why will you not allow me mine?
> And that they should no more "lay off" than you
> should douse your passion on the subject?
>
Yes. You should. Or, I'll douse you with this Holy water already.
> So...because you're a catholic, no-one should take the proverbial out
> of the papacy?
What I viewed as Mr. Thraves subjecting the Papacy to ridicule was truly unbecoming of his just nature. Apparently, it wasn't his intent. I'm almost positive the Catholic soon-to-be Mrs. Light would have similar views of you and subjugate as you fumble your integrity with your pride.
> I mean, you're welcome to register your distaste about
> it and all, but don't you think you're being...well, rather
> totalitarian minded?
I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that. I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my opinion about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
[edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
Celestine wrote:
> Yes. Why will you not allow me mine?
Oh I do; I just ask you to justify and explain it. I'm awkward like that.
> Yes. You should. Or, I'll douse you with this Holy water already.
So you retract what you said about getting people to lay off you?
> What I viewed as Mr. Thraves subjecting the Papacy to ridicule was
> truly unbecoming of his just nature. Apparently, it wasn't his
> intent. I'm almost positive the Catholic soon-to-be Mrs. Light would
> have similar views of you and subjugate as you fumble your integrity
> with your pride.
A nice sentence, with as much true meaning in terms of the English language as one would see in a Brass Eye episode.
For the record, Mrs Light is fine about my ridicule of both the office of the papacy, and the former pope himself. She understands something called Freedom of Expression. For my part, I have the courtesy not to share my more extreme views about catholicism with her. You don't have that option on a public web forum. If you don't like the views expressed, by all means say so. Telling people to stop...that's different.
> I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that
> would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that
> capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that.
> I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my opinion
> about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views
> when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
Really? I hadn't realised that. And what you say makes perfect sense, though your actions on this board don't match what you say there. Mind you, I don't claim to know the ins and outs of your relationship, so...
>
> [edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
Pending answers to the above, I'd be happy to.
> Yes. Why will you not allow me mine?
Oh I do; I just ask you to justify and explain it. I'm awkward like that.
> Yes. You should. Or, I'll douse you with this Holy water already.
So you retract what you said about getting people to lay off you?
> What I viewed as Mr. Thraves subjecting the Papacy to ridicule was
> truly unbecoming of his just nature. Apparently, it wasn't his
> intent. I'm almost positive the Catholic soon-to-be Mrs. Light would
> have similar views of you and subjugate as you fumble your integrity
> with your pride.
A nice sentence, with as much true meaning in terms of the English language as one would see in a Brass Eye episode.
For the record, Mrs Light is fine about my ridicule of both the office of the papacy, and the former pope himself. She understands something called Freedom of Expression. For my part, I have the courtesy not to share my more extreme views about catholicism with her. You don't have that option on a public web forum. If you don't like the views expressed, by all means say so. Telling people to stop...that's different.
> I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that
> would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that
> capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that.
> I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my opinion
> about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views
> when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
Really? I hadn't realised that. And what you say makes perfect sense, though your actions on this board don't match what you say there. Mind you, I don't claim to know the ins and outs of your relationship, so...
>
> [edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
Pending answers to the above, I'd be happy to.
Celestine wrote:
> Mm..hello boys.
[URL]http://img25.exs.cx/img25/3438/808ji.jpg[/URL]
> Mm..hello boys.
[URL]http://img25.exs.cx/img25/3438/808ji.jpg[/URL]
Light wrote:
> So you retract what you said about getting people to lay off you?
No. Why must you insist on pestering me? Are you trying to make me an example of something? That you're the greater of wits? Please, have the floor then. I don't understand what I did initially to generate such contempt from you. Regardless of my position on any matter, your dire attempts to condemn me are hurtful.
> For the record, Mrs Light is fine about my ridicule of both the
> office of the papacy, and the former pope himself. She understands
> something called Freedom of Expression.
Even with Freedom of Expression, as I also understand and of course allow Mr. Thraves..there must be some associated tact. I found it tactless and disappointing and scathing the low moral ground to be spinning plates and doing cartwheels in this very time. Just my opinion, of course. I'll always view him on a higher pinnacle and encourage him to strive for more.
> For my part, I have the
> courtesy not to share my more extreme views about catholicism with
> her. You don't have that option on a public web forum. If you don't
> like the views expressed, by all means say so. Telling people to
> stop...that's different.
The only thing I told you to please stop was your continuous antagonistic pestering. It's juvenile.
> I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that
> would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that
> capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that.
> I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my
> opinion
> about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views
> when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
>
> Really? I hadn't realised that. And what you say makes perfect sense,
> though your actions on this board don't match what you say there.
I don't really understand what you're trying to say, but do know that if Mr. Thraves interjected, I would listen to him. But, he hasn't.
> [edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
>
> Pending answers to the above, I'd be happy to.
Thank you.
> So you retract what you said about getting people to lay off you?
No. Why must you insist on pestering me? Are you trying to make me an example of something? That you're the greater of wits? Please, have the floor then. I don't understand what I did initially to generate such contempt from you. Regardless of my position on any matter, your dire attempts to condemn me are hurtful.
> For the record, Mrs Light is fine about my ridicule of both the
> office of the papacy, and the former pope himself. She understands
> something called Freedom of Expression.
Even with Freedom of Expression, as I also understand and of course allow Mr. Thraves..there must be some associated tact. I found it tactless and disappointing and scathing the low moral ground to be spinning plates and doing cartwheels in this very time. Just my opinion, of course. I'll always view him on a higher pinnacle and encourage him to strive for more.
> For my part, I have the
> courtesy not to share my more extreme views about catholicism with
> her. You don't have that option on a public web forum. If you don't
> like the views expressed, by all means say so. Telling people to
> stop...that's different.
The only thing I told you to please stop was your continuous antagonistic pestering. It's juvenile.
> I was going to say that I'm his girlfriend and all, but then that
> would be implying I have some kind of control over the man in that
> capacity. No. He has a mind of his own. A beautiful one at that.
> I honestly don't believe he'd restrict me from registering my
> opinion
> about anything. I can, however, appreciate and respect his views
> when I mis-step. It goes both ways.
>
> Really? I hadn't realised that. And what you say makes perfect sense,
> though your actions on this board don't match what you say there.
I don't really understand what you're trying to say, but do know that if Mr. Thraves interjected, I would listen to him. But, he hasn't.
> [edit] Now, now will you please, dear Sir Light, stop.
>
> Pending answers to the above, I'd be happy to.
Thank you.
J Nash wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Mm..hello boys.
>
> [URL]http://img25.exs.cx/img25/3438/808ji.jpg[/URL]
That's funny.
> Celestine wrote:
> Mm..hello boys.
>
> [URL]http://img25.exs.cx/img25/3438/808ji.jpg[/URL]
That's funny.
Anyone said Brian Blessed yet?
They better have, for the sake of all that is good and fat and loud and holy.
Although, for the record, I don't care, and was considering mailing the BBC about the ridiculous amount of air time spent on such bullsh. But, as usual, I CBA.
They better have, for the sake of all that is good and fat and loud and holy.
Although, for the record, I don't care, and was considering mailing the BBC about the ridiculous amount of air time spent on such bullsh. But, as usual, I CBA.
Page: