The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
People believe that it is technically murder to have a Doctor kill you. But then animals have the right to die if they are in pain, why not humans?
People believe that it is technically murder to have a Doctor kill you. But then animals have the right to die if they are in pain, why not humans?
Page:
Displayed wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> People always find ways around these things
> probably but then again maybe not.
Always always ALWAYS, i gaurantee it.
> fair enough, i have to say also to a certain point i am for both, but
> to kill a baby because of a cleft palet(sp?) is just wrong. But to
> save the mothers life then im all for it.
I think for whatever reason up to 12 weeks, you can't force someone to have a baby againts their will, that's assault. I'm not saying it's nice or you have to like it but it is the lesser of two evils.
> Flock wrote:
> People always find ways around these things
> probably but then again maybe not.
Always always ALWAYS, i gaurantee it.
> fair enough, i have to say also to a certain point i am for both, but
> to kill a baby because of a cleft palet(sp?) is just wrong. But to
> save the mothers life then im all for it.
I think for whatever reason up to 12 weeks, you can't force someone to have a baby againts their will, that's assault. I'm not saying it's nice or you have to like it but it is the lesser of two evils.
Domaye wrote:
> you can do it in erm sweden i think,
you can but whoever took you out to Switzerland, when they return to this country take the risk of being charged with murder. It was in the news about two years ago.
> you can do it in erm sweden i think,
you can but whoever took you out to Switzerland, when they return to this country take the risk of being charged with murder. It was in the news about two years ago.
you can do it in erm sweden i think, but you have to drink the lethal mixture yourself or t counts as murder.
I personally cba to go through all the points ive doon before on this subject (in class).
Sorry :(
I personally cba to go through all the points ive doon before on this subject (in class).
Sorry :(
Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and
> what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
>
> People always find ways around these things
probably but then again maybe not.
> Yeah i know, odd but regards abortion i take the rights over the
> mother over an unborn child but only up to a point. What i forgot to
> say about it was that i dont like it either but i can accept it as
> necessary evil. I think maybe i'm just more protective of the life
> thats already here.
fair enough, i have to say also to a certain point i am for both, but to kill a baby because of a cleft palet(sp?) is just wrong. but to save the mothers life then im all for it.
> Displayed wrote:
> It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and
> what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
>
> People always find ways around these things
probably but then again maybe not.
> Yeah i know, odd but regards abortion i take the rights over the
> mother over an unborn child but only up to a point. What i forgot to
> say about it was that i dont like it either but i can accept it as
> necessary evil. I think maybe i'm just more protective of the life
> thats already here.
fair enough, i have to say also to a certain point i am for both, but to kill a baby because of a cleft palet(sp?) is just wrong. but to save the mothers life then im all for it.
Displayed wrote:
> It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and
> what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
People always find ways around these things
> Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
>
> So you will kill an unborn child who could live to be a 150 year old
> person who made a cure for all diseases or something, but not someone
> who is terminally ill and in pain everyday with the poorest quality
> of life? Ok. It is your choice.
Yeah i know, odd but regards abortion i take the rights over the mother over an unborn child but only up to a point. What i forgot to say about it was that i dont like it either but i can accept it as necessary evil. I think maybe i'm just more protective of the life thats already here.
> It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and
> what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
People always find ways around these things
> Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
>
> So you will kill an unborn child who could live to be a 150 year old
> person who made a cure for all diseases or something, but not someone
> who is terminally ill and in pain everyday with the poorest quality
> of life? Ok. It is your choice.
Yeah i know, odd but regards abortion i take the rights over the mother over an unborn child but only up to a point. What i forgot to say about it was that i dont like it either but i can accept it as necessary evil. I think maybe i'm just more protective of the life thats already here.
Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
> Why?
>
> I think it could be abused.
It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
> Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
So you will kill an unborn child who could live to be a 150 year old person who made a cure for all diseases or something, but not someone who is terminally ill and in pain everyday with the poorest quality of life? Ok. It is your choice.
> Displayed wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
> Why?
>
> I think it could be abused.
It COULD be abbused but not if a law is made with no loop holes and what is says is strict an shows that it cannot be abused.
> Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
So you will kill an unborn child who could live to be a 150 year old person who made a cure for all diseases or something, but not someone who is terminally ill and in pain everyday with the poorest quality of life? Ok. It is your choice.
Displayed wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
> Why?
I think it could be abused.
>
> but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and
> thats why i'm against it.
>
> is this why you say no? but surely if you can not eat for yourself
> and in pain daily then you would want the right to go to a doctor and
> be "put to sleep" wouldnt you?
I can understand that, i can understand all the arguments for euthanasia and i can't argue with them but for me it comes right back to how i feel about it and it just feels wrong. I think i lack the intelligence to explain why.
Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
> Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
> Why?
I think it could be abused.
>
> but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and
> thats why i'm against it.
>
> is this why you say no? but surely if you can not eat for yourself
> and in pain daily then you would want the right to go to a doctor and
> be "put to sleep" wouldnt you?
I can understand that, i can understand all the arguments for euthanasia and i can't argue with them but for me it comes right back to how i feel about it and it just feels wrong. I think i lack the intelligence to explain why.
Oddly enough i'm pro choice when it comes to abortion.
Flock wrote:
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
Why?
> but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and
> thats why i'm against it.
is this why you say no? but surely if you can not eat for yourself and in pain daily then you would want the right to go to a doctor and be "put to sleep" wouldnt you?
> Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
>
> No
Why?
> but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and
> thats why i'm against it.
is this why you say no? but surely if you can not eat for yourself and in pain daily then you would want the right to go to a doctor and be "put to sleep" wouldnt you?
Displayed wrote:
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
No
> People believe that it is technically murder to have a Doctor kill
> you. But then animals have the right to die if they are in pain, why
> not humans?
Because animals dont have the capacity to kill themselves, nor do they have any real knowledge of death, any sort of morality. The choice is made in their best interests because they can't make the choice themselves and whether you like it or not, human life is more valued than animal.
Now i fully expect what i've said to be ripped apart, even i can see big holes in it but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and thats why i'm against it.
> Do you believe that euthanasia should be made legal in Britain?
No
> People believe that it is technically murder to have a Doctor kill
> you. But then animals have the right to die if they are in pain, why
> not humans?
Because animals dont have the capacity to kill themselves, nor do they have any real knowledge of death, any sort of morality. The choice is made in their best interests because they can't make the choice themselves and whether you like it or not, human life is more valued than animal.
Now i fully expect what i've said to be ripped apart, even i can see big holes in it but when it really comes down to it, it just feels wrong to me and thats why i'm against it.
Celestine wrote:
> Individuals, like Kavorkian, that administer euthanasia are probably
> real sicko's that get off on killing people. They have no
> conscience.
Never figured you would make a statement like that Celestine. Perhaps Kavorkian felt he was in a position to help terminally ill parients die with dignity and respect, as opposed to spending the rest of it in constant pain and distress. I doubt he was killing for kicks. In addition perhaps the issue of religion didn't get in his way as he didn't subscribe to any faith.
"they have no concience" is a very sweeping generalization.
> Individuals, like Kavorkian, that administer euthanasia are probably
> real sicko's that get off on killing people. They have no
> conscience.
Never figured you would make a statement like that Celestine. Perhaps Kavorkian felt he was in a position to help terminally ill parients die with dignity and respect, as opposed to spending the rest of it in constant pain and distress. I doubt he was killing for kicks. In addition perhaps the issue of religion didn't get in his way as he didn't subscribe to any faith.
"they have no concience" is a very sweeping generalization.
Page: