The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Firstly, the rules.
To place your vote, write "I vote" and the name of the person you're voting for. Try to keep chat to a minimum in this thread.
Only Regulars and existing Notables can vote, no newbies I'm afraid. Likewise, only Regulars can be voted for. You can't vote for yourself.
Votes will be accepted up to 11:59 pm tonight by the forum clock. Any votes after this time won't count.
Only one vote each. Anyone found to be voting under more than one account will have all their votes voided.
Edited posts won't count either. If you need to add/change something, make a new post.
Good luck. Voting starts... now!
To place your vote, write "I vote" and the name of the person you're voting for. Try to keep chat to a minimum in this thread.
Only Regulars and existing Notables can vote, no newbies I'm afraid. Likewise, only Regulars can be voted for. You can't vote for yourself.
Votes will be accepted up to 11:59 pm tonight by the forum clock. Any votes after this time won't count.
Only one vote each. Anyone found to be voting under more than one account will have all their votes voided.
Edited posts won't count either. If you need to add/change something, make a new post.
Good luck. Voting starts... now!
Page:
Cong Man wrote:
> In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very
> early on in the day, you don't stand a chance.
I think you right to a point. But Monkey_man was trailing behind FFF and EB till the final hour when he recived a shed load of votes.
> In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very
> early on in the day, you don't stand a chance.
I think you right to a point. But Monkey_man was trailing behind FFF and EB till the final hour when he recived a shed load of votes.
I didn't say I would vote against you, I just think the current system's better as this way it's generally a well-liked person throughout the forum that gets in, rather than some Nintendo gayby.
wang-king wrote:
> It's not like you would've got in anyway, even if a dozen people had
> voted for you a hell of a lot more would've voted just to block you.
I had anticipated that reaction from you.
Disregarded
> It's not like you would've got in anyway, even if a dozen people had
> voted for you a hell of a lot more would've voted just to block you.
I had anticipated that reaction from you.
Disregarded
It's not like you would've got in anyway, even if a dozen people had voted for you a hell of a lot more would've voted just to block you.
A thought for the next election...
Before anybody accuses me of being bitter, yeah, I am a bit, bite me ;-) Obviosuly tactical voting is and always has been an integral part of these elections, but it is also responsible for skewing the results somewhat. A couple of posters have said they would have voted for me, but due to the running results total decided I wasn't close enough to the leaders so they felt they were wasting their vote by voting for me. The mere fact that these elections are usually decided by someone seperating the two leaders at the end with a single vote bears witness to this fact.
In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very early on in the day, you don't stand a chance. Therefore, I would like to suggest voting, in the true spirit of democracy is conducted privately in future, with any talk of who people have voted for leading to the private votes being discounted. This is the only way we can have a truly fair vote.
Now, please feel free to heckle me.
Before anybody accuses me of being bitter, yeah, I am a bit, bite me ;-) Obviosuly tactical voting is and always has been an integral part of these elections, but it is also responsible for skewing the results somewhat. A couple of posters have said they would have voted for me, but due to the running results total decided I wasn't close enough to the leaders so they felt they were wasting their vote by voting for me. The mere fact that these elections are usually decided by someone seperating the two leaders at the end with a single vote bears witness to this fact.
In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very early on in the day, you don't stand a chance. Therefore, I would like to suggest voting, in the true spirit of democracy is conducted privately in future, with any talk of who people have voted for leading to the private votes being discounted. This is the only way we can have a truly fair vote.
Now, please feel free to heckle me.
just vote for EB and force a tie, having travelled back in time to before midnight... sorted
Hey, I didn't vote.
Lets do it all again - FROM THE TOP.
Lets do it all again - FROM THE TOP.
Ineedsleep wrote:
> I see GP managed to keep to his usual tradition :)
Heh, yeah, I like to keep tradition. :)
Congrats monkey man.
> I see GP managed to keep to his usual tradition :)
Heh, yeah, I like to keep tradition. :)
Congrats monkey man.
Finally the golden monkey :D
your thing, or your job?
Page: