The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Firstly, the rules.
To place your vote, write "I vote" and the name of the person you're voting for. Try to keep chat to a minimum in this thread.
Only Regulars and existing Notables can vote, no newbies I'm afraid. Likewise, only Regulars can be voted for. You can't vote for yourself.
Votes will be accepted up to 11:59 pm tonight by the forum clock. Any votes after this time won't count.
Only one vote each. Anyone found to be voting under more than one account will have all their votes voided.
Edited posts won't count either. If you need to add/change something, make a new post.
Good luck. Voting starts... now!
To place your vote, write "I vote" and the name of the person you're voting for. Try to keep chat to a minimum in this thread.
Only Regulars and existing Notables can vote, no newbies I'm afraid. Likewise, only Regulars can be voted for. You can't vote for yourself.
Votes will be accepted up to 11:59 pm tonight by the forum clock. Any votes after this time won't count.
Only one vote each. Anyone found to be voting under more than one account will have all their votes voided.
Edited posts won't count either. If you need to add/change something, make a new post.
Good luck. Voting starts... now!
Page:
I vote Hedfix.
I vote for yassa Arafat.
Via-torala wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easy enough just to keep the votes hidden until the end
> and then when it's over they can be put up?
Coin wrote:
> Mmm... The elections should be a hidden poll.
> Wouldn't it be easy enough just to keep the votes hidden until the end
> and then when it's over they can be put up?
Coin wrote:
> Mmm... The elections should be a hidden poll.
Wouldn't it be easy enough just to keep the votes hidden until the end and then when it's over they can be put up?
Coin wrote:
> Mmm... The elections should be a hidden poll.
>
> As in not viewable by public - viewable by staff though, obviously.
>
> Or they could just edit all the votes and vote whoever they want
> notable.
I wouldn't trust the staffies not to fix it.
It's still just down to groups who talk to eachother voting people in, it's never going to be totally fair.
although what yesterdays result proved was last minute campaigning works a treat.
MM wouldn't have won if all the people who said they didn't vote for EB cause they thought he was going to win it easily had infact voted.
> Mmm... The elections should be a hidden poll.
>
> As in not viewable by public - viewable by staff though, obviously.
>
> Or they could just edit all the votes and vote whoever they want
> notable.
I wouldn't trust the staffies not to fix it.
It's still just down to groups who talk to eachother voting people in, it's never going to be totally fair.
although what yesterdays result proved was last minute campaigning works a treat.
MM wouldn't have won if all the people who said they didn't vote for EB cause they thought he was going to win it easily had infact voted.
What idiot voted for mm!
Mmm... The elections should be a hidden poll.
As in not viewable by public - viewable by staff though, obviously.
Or they could just edit all the votes and vote whoever they want notable.
(First time in a while I haven't even got one vote. I guess I'm doing something wrong...)
As in not viewable by public - viewable by staff though, obviously.
Or they could just edit all the votes and vote whoever they want notable.
(First time in a while I haven't even got one vote. I guess I'm doing something wrong...)
Hedfix wrote:
> Well once again the better posters get 2nd and 3rd.
>
> Same as usual.
>
> I'm off.
Once again a negative post from you. good work
> Well once again the better posters get 2nd and 3rd.
>
> Same as usual.
>
> I'm off.
Once again a negative post from you. good work
Cong Man wrote:
> A thought for the next election...
>
> Before anybody accuses me of being bitter, yeah, I am a bit, bite me
> ;-) Obviosuly tactical voting is and always has been an integral part
> of these elections, but it is also responsible for skewing the
> results somewhat. A couple of posters have said they would have voted
> for me, but due to the running results total decided I wasn't close
> enough to the leaders so they felt they were wasting their vote by
> voting for me. The mere fact that these elections are usually decided
> by someone seperating the two leaders at the end with a single vote
> bears witness to this fact.
>
> In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very
> early on in the day, you don't stand a chance. Therefore, I would
> like to suggest voting, in the true spirit of democracy is conducted
> privately in future, with any talk of who people have voted for
> leading to the private votes being discounted. This is the only way
> we can have a truly fair vote.
>
> Now, please feel free to heckle me.
Been saying that for a while.
Anyway I must go.
> A thought for the next election...
>
> Before anybody accuses me of being bitter, yeah, I am a bit, bite me
> ;-) Obviosuly tactical voting is and always has been an integral part
> of these elections, but it is also responsible for skewing the
> results somewhat. A couple of posters have said they would have voted
> for me, but due to the running results total decided I wasn't close
> enough to the leaders so they felt they were wasting their vote by
> voting for me. The mere fact that these elections are usually decided
> by someone seperating the two leaders at the end with a single vote
> bears witness to this fact.
>
> In other words, unless you get a lot of people to vote for you very
> early on in the day, you don't stand a chance. Therefore, I would
> like to suggest voting, in the true spirit of democracy is conducted
> privately in future, with any talk of who people have voted for
> leading to the private votes being discounted. This is the only way
> we can have a truly fair vote.
>
> Now, please feel free to heckle me.
Been saying that for a while.
Anyway I must go.
Well once again the better posters get 2nd and 3rd.
Same as usual.
I'm off.
Same as usual.
I'm off.
Page: