Viewing Thread:
"The reason why ukchatforums.com is a small place."

I've posted 2 posts an 34 words this month, an i am #364 in the top posters list!

And the smell resembles the smell of A PAEDOPHILE OMFG GET AWAY FROM MY ASS

I can't, im stuck.

Top posters list in the last 30 days....
Nothing special, to be fair.

rah wrote:
> Cong Man wrote:
> Silent Thunder wrote:
> Emitime is under 20, but you wouldn't class his use of English
> language reasonable?
>
> I haven't met him.
>
> But you're still able to judge whether his grasp of english is
> sufficient...

Indeed I am and his grasp is darn good. What I said, if we're splitting hairs is, that I'd never MET anyone under the age of 20 with a decent grasp of English.

I see.

I assume though that you've met a lot of people over 20 who don't have a decent grasp of English either?

Or does everybodies English just "get better" on their 20th birthday?

munn wrote:
>
> Or does everybodies English just "get better" on their 20th
> birthday?

They think it has after a few drinks. The opposite is usually true.

Cong Man wrote:
> I can't even remember being 14. Now that's sad.

Not sad, just forgetful. I can remember being 13 and I'm older than you.

Silent Thunder wrote:
> Last year, when I was 14, was great. School was easy and we basically
> got to do anything we liked, loads of trips etc. Different now
> though.

LOL all through your GCSE's its easy & you get to do what you want.

Hey, I'm under 20 and my grasp of English is sufficient to be writing an extensive essay on Crime and Punishment, write poems better than Seamus Heaney (sad loser) according to everyone I've ever met and to think that JK Rowling is one of the worst things to have ever happened to the English language.

Surrealguy wrote:
> Hey, I'm under 20 and my grasp of English is sufficient... to
> think that JK Rowling is one of the worst things to have ever
> happened to the English language.

I agree with you there.