The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've posted 2 posts an 34 words this month, an i am #364 in the top posters list!
Page:
mermoid wrote:
> Pffft.
> It's blatantly obvious that a vast number of under 20s have a
> perfectly good grasp of the English language.
Yes, they just can't count.
> Pffft.
> It's blatantly obvious that a vast number of under 20s have a
> perfectly good grasp of the English language.
Yes, they just can't count.
It's true that you don't see that many newbies around here anymore. The only one that doesn't seem to cause too much trouble is rah, but by his next post he'll be a regular too. Unless it's one of those three word posts.
One concurs entirely dearest Memorandumorandyoirland.
Pffft.
It's blatantly obvious that a vast number of under 20s have a perfectly good grasp of the English language. In fact, why wouldn't they? It's not like the language suddenly clicks with everyone the minute they leave their teens.
Look around this forum and you'll see plenty of examples of teenagers with excellent linguistic abilities.
It's blatantly obvious that a vast number of under 20s have a perfectly good grasp of the English language. In fact, why wouldn't they? It's not like the language suddenly clicks with everyone the minute they leave their teens.
Look around this forum and you'll see plenty of examples of teenagers with excellent linguistic abilities.
i just tried searching that post for bad grammar. but it was perfect. *gives Cong an A* er... *
mermoid wrote:
> Cong Man wrote:
> I've yet to meet someone under the age of twenty to have waht I
> would class as a reasonable grasp of the English language.
>
> "waht"
Congratulations, you have won this years award for anal retentiveness. An obvious typo isn't in the same league as mis-use of words, punctuation or grammar.
> Cong Man wrote:
> I've yet to meet someone under the age of twenty to have waht I
> would class as a reasonable grasp of the English language.
>
> "waht"
Congratulations, you have won this years award for anal retentiveness. An obvious typo isn't in the same league as mis-use of words, punctuation or grammar.
[URL]http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=offtopicness[/URL]
he aint lying.
he aint lying.
Ragha\/ wrote:
> I don't thinks anylonger that ukchatforums.com is a small place
> because this thread has got so much of replies in so less
> time.
>
> (and its like ever other forum where the topic of thread gets
> deviated from the original post. Same with you gays, you gave 39
> replies; all of which never had anything to do with my original
> post!)
Actually mine did, and showed that the first post was invalid.
Invalid first post = Offtopicness.
(I did just make up that word[/I])
> I don't thinks anylonger that ukchatforums.com is a small place
> because this thread has got so much of replies in so less
> time.
>
> (and its like ever other forum where the topic of thread gets
> deviated from the original post. Same with you gays, you gave 39
> replies; all of which never had anything to do with my original
> post!)
Actually mine did, and showed that the first post was invalid.
Invalid first post = Offtopicness.
(I did just make up that word[/I])
Ragha\/ wrote:
> Sorry, I meant \"guys\" and not \"gays\"
Nah you ment gays or you would have hit the 'edit post' button and changed it.
> Sorry, I meant \"guys\" and not \"gays\"
Nah you ment gays or you would have hit the 'edit post' button and changed it.
Sorry, I meant \"guys\" and not \"gays\"
Page: