The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Oh yes. A third round draw.
Replay at St. James' Park in Exeter.
Replay at St. James' Park in Exeter.
Page:
Exeter suck, Torquay are the South West's gods.
Boooo!
(bitter. Well, a tiny bit)
Boooo!
(bitter. Well, a tiny bit)
Ashman wrote:
> And you're telling me this isn't a huge upset?
Indeed it is.
> You're telling me these players are barely fit to play in the Conference?
Indeed they are
> Can I tell you how much, as a Woking fan, I'd kill for ANY of your 16
> players on the field or bench?
Have them. Have them all, including the manager.
*small print: this offer does not include Rio, Keane, Scholes, Rooney, Giggs, Heinze, G.Neville or Ruud
> And you're telling me this isn't a huge upset?
Indeed it is.
> You're telling me these players are barely fit to play in the Conference?
Indeed they are
> Can I tell you how much, as a Woking fan, I'd kill for ANY of your 16
> players on the field or bench?
Have them. Have them all, including the manager.
*small print: this offer does not include Rio, Keane, Scholes, Rooney, Giggs, Heinze, G.Neville or Ruud
I've begin to hate Fergie over the last few years. Ever since we won the treble he seems to think that whatever team Utd put out, they'll beat anyone. I hate him resting players as we end up drawing and sometimes even losing to the poorest of teams. If I were a manager I'd throw on my best 11 every game and maybe change one or two players now and again depending on how they play in training.
AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Ashman wrote:
> You're telling me these players are barely fit to play in the
> Conference?
>
> Indeed they are
>
> Can I tell you how much, as a Woking fan, I'd kill for ANY of your
> 16 players on the field or bench?
>
> Have them. Have them all, including the manager.
>
> *small print: this offer does not include Rio, Keane, Scholes,
> Rooney, Giggs, Heinze, G.Neville or Ruud
That was written in a serious-ish manner, so I'll take it you're being serious. In which case:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAAHHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You IDIOT. You clearly have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about. So, Smith and Saha - they can just leave. Yeah, they sound perfect fringe players for a Conference team. Ahahaha.
And Ronaldo, yeah, I suppose over £10mils worth of astonishingly talented winger is about right for a Conference club again.
I'm telling you, down as low as your bloody youth players; they'd hardly have to move a muscle in training to get a place in most Conference starting line-ups.
Personally I'm betting you've watched about half an hours worth of lower league football and you think you know what you're talking about. Clearly, you haven't a clue.
> Ashman wrote:
> You're telling me these players are barely fit to play in the
> Conference?
>
> Indeed they are
>
> Can I tell you how much, as a Woking fan, I'd kill for ANY of your
> 16 players on the field or bench?
>
> Have them. Have them all, including the manager.
>
> *small print: this offer does not include Rio, Keane, Scholes,
> Rooney, Giggs, Heinze, G.Neville or Ruud
That was written in a serious-ish manner, so I'll take it you're being serious. In which case:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAAHHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You IDIOT. You clearly have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about. So, Smith and Saha - they can just leave. Yeah, they sound perfect fringe players for a Conference team. Ahahaha.
And Ronaldo, yeah, I suppose over £10mils worth of astonishingly talented winger is about right for a Conference club again.
I'm telling you, down as low as your bloody youth players; they'd hardly have to move a muscle in training to get a place in most Conference starting line-ups.
Personally I'm betting you've watched about half an hours worth of lower league football and you think you know what you're talking about. Clearly, you haven't a clue.
Quinty wrote:
> Kawada wrote:
> They were all calling it a massive upset and shock
>
> It is though, isn't it?
No, a 'massive' upset would be if they had drawn with our first team. It was merely an upset an embarrasing upset but just an upset.
Tis the wording i'm taking objection to
> Kawada wrote:
> They were all calling it a massive upset and shock
>
> It is though, isn't it?
No, a 'massive' upset would be if they had drawn with our first team. It was merely an upset an embarrasing upset but just an upset.
Tis the wording i'm taking objection to
Quinty wrote:
> We dont all play in shacks :-)
Well of course not some conference teams play in Sheds and the really well off teams play in the home extension (can't spell the proper word for it beginning with C :-D)
> We dont all play in shacks :-)
Well of course not some conference teams play in Sheds and the really well off teams play in the home extension (can't spell the proper word for it beginning with C :-D)
Ashman wrote:
> I'm telling you, down as low as your bloody youth players; they'd
> hardly have to move a muscle in training to get a place in most
> Conference starting line-ups.
Exactly, we were lucky enough to have Lee Barnard (Lil Bro will know him) from Spurs on loan for 4 matches when we were short, he totally and utterly bossed things. And thats WAYYY down the youth system.
> I'm telling you, down as low as your bloody youth players; they'd
> hardly have to move a muscle in training to get a place in most
> Conference starting line-ups.
Exactly, we were lucky enough to have Lee Barnard (Lil Bro will know him) from Spurs on loan for 4 matches when we were short, he totally and utterly bossed things. And thats WAYYY down the youth system.
excuse for drawing - we wanted the TV revenue. genius.
Vampyr wrote:
> excuse for drawing - we wanted the TV revenue. genius.
That would wash if you weren't filthy rich.
Next.
> excuse for drawing - we wanted the TV revenue. genius.
That would wash if you weren't filthy rich.
Next.
yeah i know, its actually cause we played a rubbish squad, still should have won thouhg
Page: