GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Chronicles of Riddick"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sun 02/01/05 at 16:21
Regular
Posts: 20,776
What a disappointment.

In the end it was just Ming the Merciless and Flash Gordon all over again, except this time Flash had an attitude and a worrying obsession with knives. And did I see Riddick nearly crying at the end? Bless his cotton socks, and we all thought he was ruthless.

Predictable, distinctly average and instantly forgettable. After playing the game I suppose my expectations were way too high.

Just another quart of bile in a sea of fecal matter rushing out of the huge spotty behind of the soulless hollywood machine. "Tell you what lads, if we put enough explosions and killing in it, those suckers'll lap it up."
Sat 08/01/05 at 13:26
Regular
"8==="
Posts: 33,481
Pandaemonium wrote:
> ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> In the end it was just Ming the Merciless and Flash Gordon all over
> again, except this time Flash had an attitude and a worrying
> obsession with knives.
>
> That's all I thought it was. Flash Gordon minus the Queen Soundtrack.
> Campy fun. Appalingly directed, written and acted throughout.
> Definately in my bad movie top 10.

At least Flash Gordon had Blessed gloriously hamming it up and Dalton looking like Peter Pan.
Sat 08/01/05 at 13:25
Regular
"8==="
Posts: 33,481
Goatboy wrote:
> I enjoyed the 1st one so I'll watch this with a big bowl of popcorn
> and leave my brain outside.

Tip: Just think "I'm Bell posting in the Life forum"
Fri 07/01/05 at 20:55
Regular
"Catch it!"
Posts: 6,840
Forza wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel
> in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it.
>
> I think he's trying to tell us something.

LOL what do you think hes trying to tell us?
Fri 07/01/05 at 20:52
Regular
"Lisan al-Gaib"
Posts: 7,093
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> In the end it was just Ming the Merciless and Flash Gordon all over
> again, except this time Flash had an attitude and a worrying
> obsession with knives.

That's all I thought it was. Flash Gordon minus the Queen Soundtrack. Campy fun. Appalingly directed, written and acted throughout. Definately in my bad movie top 10.
Fri 07/01/05 at 19:54
Regular
Posts: 20,776
Goatboy wrote:
> I enjoyed the 1st one so I'll watch this with a big bowl of popcorn
> and leave my brain outside.

Now that does surprise me. I shall expect a patented Goatboy review afterwards.
Thu 06/01/05 at 21:54
Regular
"Who Hell He?"
Posts: 363
Tue 04/01/05 at 19:02
Regular
"aka memo aaka gayby"
Posts: 11,948
He was perfectly clear, you're just a bit slow.
Tue 04/01/05 at 15:42
Regular
"The definitive tag"
Posts: 3,752
cookie monster wrote:
> Chr1s wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel
> in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it.
>
> Vin Diesel is NOT a good actor.
>
> Well done, you drew the wrong conclusion from my post.

C'mon man, you could have been more clear.
Tue 04/01/05 at 14:49
Regular
"+34 Intellect"
Posts: 21,334
Chr1s wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel
> in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in
> it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin
> Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It had Vin Diesel in it. It
> had Vin Diesel in it.
>
> Vin Diesel is NOT a good actor.

Well done, you drew the wrong conclusion from my post.
Tue 04/01/05 at 10:49
Regular
"Wanking Mong"
Posts: 4,884
Seriously, this is one of the biggest piles of assorted mammal excretia that I've ever seen in my life. Incoherent, poorly acted, appallingly plotted, pretentious, portentious (it wishes), self important bilge.

There isn't enough popcorn in the world to make this film even slightly bearable.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Many thanks!
You were 100% right - great support!
LOVE it....
You have made it so easy to build & host a website!!!
Gemma

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Close Feedback

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.