The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Defoe's goal was better than Vieira's by a mile.
Probably better than Alonso's too.
Grr
Probably better than Alonso's too.
Grr
Page:
Exactly.
I remember the Champions League nights when Atkinson would verbally ejaculate over United.
I remember the Champions League nights when Atkinson would verbally ejaculate over United.
Cycloon wrote:
> Defoe's was a great strike.
>
> Viera's was 4/5 passes that tore apart an entire team and ended with
> an exquisite chip.
exquisite
ahahahahahahah it was such a blatant mis-hit
> Defoe's was a great strike.
>
> Viera's was 4/5 passes that tore apart an entire team and ended with
> an exquisite chip.
exquisite
ahahahahahahah it was such a blatant mis-hit
Quinty wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> the finished was quite a blatant mis-hit, if he had hit it well im
> sure it would have been hit harder,
>
> I'm simply gobsmacked. Is there any limit to your ignorance?
>
> Funnily enough a chip was the ONLY thing Viera could do with an
> oncoming keeper flying out at 100MPH. Fact is, it would have been
> virtually impossible to hit it hard and then expect the ball to go
> in.
You've obviously never, ever, played football in your life.
> Lil Bro wrote:
> the finished was quite a blatant mis-hit, if he had hit it well im
> sure it would have been hit harder,
>
> I'm simply gobsmacked. Is there any limit to your ignorance?
>
> Funnily enough a chip was the ONLY thing Viera could do with an
> oncoming keeper flying out at 100MPH. Fact is, it would have been
> virtually impossible to hit it hard and then expect the ball to go
> in.
You've obviously never, ever, played football in your life.
Lil Bro wrote:
> Cycloon wrote:
> Defoe's was a great strike.
>
> Viera's was 4/5 passes that tore apart an entire team and ended with
> an exquisite chip.
>
> exquisite
>
> ahahahahahahah it was such a blatant mis-hit
*yawn* When a player stamps their foot into the ground, just below the ball, you instantly know its gonna be a small chip, if he had side footed it, it would have hit the keeper, if not it would have gone wide.
You have obviously never played football before. :P
> Cycloon wrote:
> Defoe's was a great strike.
>
> Viera's was 4/5 passes that tore apart an entire team and ended with
> an exquisite chip.
>
> exquisite
>
> ahahahahahahah it was such a blatant mis-hit
*yawn* When a player stamps their foot into the ground, just below the ball, you instantly know its gonna be a small chip, if he had side footed it, it would have hit the keeper, if not it would have gone wide.
You have obviously never played football before. :P
mattributé wrote:
> That is the most idiotic thing you've ever said.
Even if it was (which it isn't seeing as Atkinson back in 90's is nowhere near as bad as Andy 'Oh my god what a backpass by campbell' Gray) it still is nowhere near the level of stupidity you have reached in the past :-D
> That is the most idiotic thing you've ever said.
Even if it was (which it isn't seeing as Atkinson back in 90's is nowhere near as bad as Andy 'Oh my god what a backpass by campbell' Gray) it still is nowhere near the level of stupidity you have reached in the past :-D
No, look, listen to me Toaster.
You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
Lil Bro wrote:
> No, look, listen to me Toaster.
>
> You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case
> Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a
> few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish
> either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
Yes and i've accepted that you are different to everyone else.
> No, look, listen to me Toaster.
>
> You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case
> Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a
> few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish
> either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
Yes and i've accepted that you are different to everyone else.
Aha. Yeh whatever.
Are you permanently on here?
Are you permanently on here?
I can be if you want.
Lil Bro wrote:
> You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case
> Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a
> few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish
> either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
Or a perfectly weighted shot? But hey dont let the facts get in the way of your ignorance it never has. And dont resort to petty rubbish, i've played in goal for long enough to know thats not a mis-hit, if it was the pundits would certainly have picked up on it.
I win, you lose.
> You can chip a ball with quite an element of power, and in that case
> Vieira should have done so, seeing as the defender was literally, a
> few inches away from stopping it. This, for me, makes the finish
> either just a poor finish, or a mis-hit.
Or a perfectly weighted shot? But hey dont let the facts get in the way of your ignorance it never has. And dont resort to petty rubbish, i've played in goal for long enough to know thats not a mis-hit, if it was the pundits would certainly have picked up on it.
I win, you lose.
Page: