The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Im unsure of which to get, both have recieved pretty average reviews from IGN yet they've had some great reviews from the mags.
So which one, if any?
So which one, if any?
Page:
Well two people out of this thread who are probably the only two who have played it from this thread went with Killzone. I would say your 99% figure is crap. But why not join the band-wagon of people who haven't played Killzone but seem to somehow think it sucks.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Yes because reviews are everything.
>
Well, considering that these are pretty much the only reference points we have, and oh, practically 99% of people who've played both games have reinforced the points, yes.
> Yes because reviews are everything.
>
Well, considering that these are pretty much the only reference points we have, and oh, practically 99% of people who've played both games have reinforced the points, yes.
Coin wrote:
> Go home.
haha munched
> Go home.
haha munched
Yes because reviews are everything.
I would go with Killzone and if you have a reasonable PC get Call of Duty there. Console version doesn't translate well from the level I have played and the sense of confusion and furious fast paced action isn't a patch on the PC version so what you are left with is a Frontline style port making an awesome series birth an average title.
I would go with Killzone and if you have a reasonable PC get Call of Duty there. Console version doesn't translate well from the level I have played and the sense of confusion and furious fast paced action isn't a patch on the PC version so what you are left with is a Frontline style port making an awesome series birth an average title.
Both have pretty average reviews. Depends - sci-fi averageness or WW2 averageness?
Go home.
Halo 2
Due to FM, Killzone now comes third on my chrimbo list.
Call of Duty
KILLZONE IT IS WICKED!!!!!!
Page: