GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Terrifically interesting thread"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sat 11/12/04 at 19:15
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
I need to know the resistvity value of copper, please people. I have two figures in front of me and I need to decide... NOW.

Don't worry I'm not just doing this for the fun of it, it's for Physics.

Cheers
Sun 12/12/04 at 07:47
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
Could be worth an extra mark. It is c/w.
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:35
Regular
"Sure.Fine.Whatever."
Posts: 9,629
Forest Fan wrote:
> It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use
> which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.

the figure is so small a couple of extra decimal places makes little difference.
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:31
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:27
Regular
"Sure.Fine.Whatever."
Posts: 9,629
Forest Fan wrote:
> Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
>
> What do you think it is?

Sorry read what you wrote as 1.678 to the minus 9, its ok
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:26
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF

What do you think it is?
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:25
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
Haldisa wrote:
> I told you, 16-17 x 10^-9 ohm metres

That wasn't aimed at you, I was writing that message before I saw your post, but anyway...
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:25
Regular
"Sure.Fine.Whatever."
Posts: 9,629
Forest Fan wrote:
> chippxero wrote:
> 1.678 (microohm-cm) What ever that means. Thats at room temp.
>
> [URL]http://www.epanorama.net/documents/wiring/wire_resistance.html[/URL]
>
> Cheers.
>
> It looks like 1.678 x10 -8 is the right number. Still, I
> appreciate any more comments.

thats out by a factor of 10 FF
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:24
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
chippxero wrote:
> 1.678 (microohm-cm) What ever that means. Thats at room temp.
>
> [URL]http://www.epanorama.net/documents/wiring/wire_resistance.html[/URL]

Cheers.

It looks like 1.678 x10 -8 is the right number. Still, I appreciate any more comments.
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:23
Regular
"Sure.Fine.Whatever."
Posts: 9,629
Forest Fan wrote:
> I really need an exact figure, it should be a decimal x 10 to a
> negative power.

I told you, 16-17 x 10^-9 ohm metres

you do realise nano is to the -9 right? doing physics and all
Sat 11/12/04 at 19:22
Regular
"RIP: Brian Clough"
Posts: 10,491
I really need an exact figure, it should be a decimal x 10 to a negative power.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Many thanks!
You were 100% right - great support!
I am delighted.
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do. I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.