The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Don't worry I'm not just doing this for the fun of it, it's for Physics.
Cheers
> It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use
> which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.
the figure is so small a couple of extra decimal places makes little difference.
> Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
>
> What do you think it is?
Sorry read what you wrote as 1.678 to the minus 9, its ok
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
What do you think it is?
> I told you, 16-17 x 10^-9 ohm metres
That wasn't aimed at you, I was writing that message before I saw your post, but anyway...
> chippxero wrote:
> 1.678 (microohm-cm) What ever that means. Thats at room temp.
>
> [URL]http://www.epanorama.net/documents/wiring/wire_resistance.html[/URL]
>
> Cheers.
>
> It looks like 1.678 x10 -8 is the right number. Still, I
> appreciate any more comments.
thats out by a factor of 10 FF
> 1.678 (microohm-cm) What ever that means. Thats at room temp.
>
> [URL]http://www.epanorama.net/documents/wiring/wire_resistance.html[/URL]
Cheers.
It looks like 1.678 x10 -8 is the right number. Still, I appreciate any more comments.
> I really need an exact figure, it should be a decimal x 10 to a
> negative power.
I told you, 16-17 x 10^-9 ohm metres
you do realise nano is to the -9 right? doing physics and all