The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I need to know the resistvity value of copper, please people. I have two figures in front of me and I need to decide... NOW.
Don't worry I'm not just doing this for the fun of it, it's for Physics.
Cheers
Don't worry I'm not just doing this for the fun of it, it's for Physics.
Cheers
Page:
Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
What do you think it is?
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
What do you think it is?
Forest Fan wrote:
> Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
>
> What do you think it is?
Sorry read what you wrote as 1.678 to the minus 9, its ok
> Haldisa wrote:
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
>
> What do you think it is?
Sorry read what you wrote as 1.678 to the minus 9, its ok
It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.
Forest Fan wrote:
> It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use
> which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.
the figure is so small a couple of extra decimal places makes little difference.
> It's a bit of an improvement that figure than what I was going to use
> which was 1.6 x 10 -8 , so thanks.
the figure is so small a couple of extra decimal places makes little difference.
Could be worth an extra mark. It is c/w.
Haldisa wrote:
>
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
Such are the risks of giving a fundamentalist christian a question about science. I'm amazed he didn't give the answer as "God decides all relative values and therefore it's not for sinful man to know".
>
> thats out by a factor of 10 FF
Such are the risks of giving a fundamentalist christian a question about science. I'm amazed he didn't give the answer as "God decides all relative values and therefore it's not for sinful man to know".
Try reading the whole thread, Einstein. Simpleton.
[URL]http://www.env-steward.com/reflect/creation/newstory.htm[/URL]
Forest Fan wrote:
> Try reading the whole thread, Einstein. Simpleton.
oooooOOOOOOOoooooo! Get her...
I have read the whole thread. So...what's your point? Have you suddenly changed from a fundamentalist christian who runs screaming from the prospect of having to explain the nature of how the 2nd law of thermodynamics only applies to a closed system? Have you stopped ignoring the reams of scientific discovery that blast your bigotry from the water?
Oh, by the way; you might want to think about rearranging the structure of your insult. It's just not that good.
> Try reading the whole thread, Einstein. Simpleton.
oooooOOOOOOOoooooo! Get her...
I have read the whole thread. So...what's your point? Have you suddenly changed from a fundamentalist christian who runs screaming from the prospect of having to explain the nature of how the 2nd law of thermodynamics only applies to a closed system? Have you stopped ignoring the reams of scientific discovery that blast your bigotry from the water?
Oh, by the way; you might want to think about rearranging the structure of your insult. It's just not that good.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> [URL]http://www.env-steward.com/reflect/creation/newstory.htm[/URL]
Heh. I like that a lot. I've always thought that the story of creation and the theory of evolution are completely compatible; the christian story can easily be seen as an allegory. It's only when sadsack little fundamentalists (scientific and religious) insist that THEIR version is the UNVARNISHED TRUTH that the sparks fly and the intellect crumbles.
> [URL]http://www.env-steward.com/reflect/creation/newstory.htm[/URL]
Heh. I like that a lot. I've always thought that the story of creation and the theory of evolution are completely compatible; the christian story can easily be seen as an allegory. It's only when sadsack little fundamentalists (scientific and religious) insist that THEIR version is the UNVARNISHED TRUTH that the sparks fly and the intellect crumbles.
Page: