The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Serious analytical tone required:
The top posters list has no-one with over a thousand posts, normally the top 2 are around 1200.
The general trend this month is less posts.
Is this due to the banning spree, or are SR spammers maturing?
That is all.
The top posters list has no-one with over a thousand posts, normally the top 2 are around 1200.
The general trend this month is less posts.
Is this due to the banning spree, or are SR spammers maturing?
That is all.
Page:
Wow, on top of me for the second time this week :P
ARGH! 6th!!!
Wow.
Down to seventh, that's a turn up for the books.
Down to seventh, that's a turn up for the books.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Ineedsleep wrote:
> Phew. Thanks for solving that for me. It explains why I am so high
> on the list. I thought it was me needing a life but apparently it's
> a case of everyone else getting one.
>
> Same here.
> I was getting worried
Worry not, it must be getting really desperate if there is a danger of me being in the top 20, which to the best of my knowledge (I don't normally check) probably hasn't happened before.
> Ineedsleep wrote:
> Phew. Thanks for solving that for me. It explains why I am so high
> on the list. I thought it was me needing a life but apparently it's
> a case of everyone else getting one.
>
> Same here.
> I was getting worried
Worry not, it must be getting really desperate if there is a danger of me being in the top 20, which to the best of my knowledge (I don't normally check) probably hasn't happened before.
Ineedsleep wrote:
> Phew. Thanks for solving that for me. It explains why I am so high
> on the list. I thought it was me needing a life but apparently it's
> a case of everyone else getting one.
Same here.
I was getting worried
> Phew. Thanks for solving that for me. It explains why I am so high
> on the list. I thought it was me needing a life but apparently it's
> a case of everyone else getting one.
Same here.
I was getting worried
SHEEPY wrote:
> I always have the lowest sperm count.
>
> Woo-hoo
> I always have the lowest sperm count.
>
> Woo-hoo
Lucy Jane wrote:
> Cong_Man wrote:
> My comments were not aimed at your good self.
>
> Are your good words aimed at me then?!
Not you either. Sheesh. Paranoia running wild or what?
> Cong_Man wrote:
> My comments were not aimed at your good self.
>
> Are your good words aimed at me then?!
Not you either. Sheesh. Paranoia running wild or what?
Cong_Man wrote:
> My comments were not aimed at your good self.
Are your good words aimed at me then?!
> My comments were not aimed at your good self.
Are your good words aimed at me then?!
I'm number 7 in the "top" 100 for this month - how in the name of Jesus' buttocks did that happen?
chippxero wrote:
> I can't help but think that your comments are aimed at me I am a noob
> and I am about 43 in the top 100 but I have tried not to spam too
> much I just want to be a regular. But I haven't just posted rubbish
> some of it's good. :D
>
> If your comments wern't aimmed at me learn to aim.
My comments were not aimed at your good self.
> I can't help but think that your comments are aimed at me I am a noob
> and I am about 43 in the top 100 but I have tried not to spam too
> much I just want to be a regular. But I haven't just posted rubbish
> some of it's good. :D
>
> If your comments wern't aimmed at me learn to aim.
My comments were not aimed at your good self.
Page: