Viewing Thread:
"JBL worst champ ever"

Is it me or is JBL the worst champion ever?? he won the title from the second worst champion ever!! look down the years the guys who have worn the WWE/WWF title: Ultimate Warrior, Hogan, HBK, Bret Hart, Austin, Rock and Macho Man, the list of great names could go on but this past year i've never seen two worst champs in my long 14 years of watching Wrestling! there are a few guys on Smackdown who are worthy of the title right now: Undertaker, Kurt Angle and The Big Show! so let me know what you think about our crap champion!

Eddie could more than hold his own against those you mentioned.

I mentioned Arquette. He may have won the title in WCW but the title is now under WWE control, lineage and all.

bottom line! Eddie G was a bad champion! he wouldnt last 10 minutes with guys like Austin, Hogan, Taker! by the way sum1 mention Arquitte! when was he WWE/WWF champ? he was WCW!

Nope, can't remember any. Unless Booker had a shot? If he did, I don't remember it...

You've got to give Eddie some credit. He actually got a half decent match out of JBL. I can't remember, was there any other challengers beside JBL and Angle?

Eddie was made to look like a weak champion because the WWE didn't build up any credible challengers for him. Instead he had to carry a useless guy like JBL to matches. I can only imagine how good a champ Eddie would have looked if he had a Benoit or a Jericho to feud with, someone who could match him every step of the way in the ring...

I think Kurt Angle is a better wrestler than Eddie but to say Eddie is a weak champ is a joke. Eddie didn't win the title because Brock was leaving. Eddie was always going to win the title because Brock V Goldberg was not going to be for the title.

As for the list of poor champs, Hogan's run when he beat Triple H in 2002 was a shocking mistake. Randy Orton's in ring work makes him worse than Eddie. Big Show with the title was really poor. Brock Lesnar winning the title that early showed how poor he was. At least he improved but he still wasn't better than Eddie. Triple H's recent runs have been pretty boring.

Oh yes, just thought of a couple more. Vince McMahon, David Arquette and Vine Russo anyone?

My opinion obviously but I think Eddie's in ring work is much better than those I've mentioned and I'd be happy to see Eddie with the title again.

Sorry like but Kurt Angle is a much better champ than Eddie! Eddie only won the title because Brock Lesnar was leaving! Eddie only beat Angle at Mania because Angle was leaving for surgery so the 1st guy to come along to fight Eddie who wasnt leaving was JBL and he beat Eddie! who else on your list of crap champs have you got??

ashton wrote:
> he won the title from the second worst champion ever!!

Erm, didn't JBL win the title off Eddie Guerrero? Eddie Guerrero is no way the second worst champion ever. I could reel off a list of rubbish champions. Eddie is way better than them. He's only just behind a full flow Angle in my opinion.

Is it me or is JBL the worst champion ever?? he won the title from the second worst champion ever!! look down the years the guys who have worn the WWE/WWF title: Ultimate Warrior, Hogan, HBK, Bret Hart, Austin, Rock and Macho Man, the list of great names could go on but this past year i've never seen two worst champs in my long 14 years of watching Wrestling! there are a few guys on Smackdown who are worthy of the title right now: Undertaker, Kurt Angle and The Big Show! so let me know what you think about our crap champion!