The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
looks like hes being investigated after his nasty tackle on Cole yesterday from what I see it was nasty and quite frankly hopes he gets a heavy ban The Game could do with out that ........ the papers were full of it too saying United and Riley are cheats lol my view is he did catch him even if it was minimal it was a silly challenge
Page:
lalakersrule wrote:
> yea happens at Arsenal to, so they can't complain
yes it does, but they are still class above everyone else dispite sundays result.
> yea happens at Arsenal to, so they can't complain
yes it does, but they are still class above everyone else dispite sundays result.
yea happens at Arsenal to, so they can't complain
Solskjær wrote:
> Yes, I'm still intrigued to see what on Earth they're gonna do with
> Adrian Mutu - and, hopefully (although, I may be asking just-too-much
> of them...), I'd like to think they'll have the matter settled
> this year!
>
> :P
>
> And, indeed, the very next time we see a Premiership player commit
> himself with a challenge deemed a little 'too much' for their
> liking.
>
> I mean, if it was really such a bad challenge, why didn't the ref'
> just send him off, on-the-spot?
> (Oh, shut up about Mike Riley, Scoper!)
because he was payed not too :P lol nah home bios is my guess it happens at united all too often
and mutu was a fool unto himself I hate drugs so my view is he deserves what he gets
> Yes, I'm still intrigued to see what on Earth they're gonna do with
> Adrian Mutu - and, hopefully (although, I may be asking just-too-much
> of them...), I'd like to think they'll have the matter settled
> this year!
>
> :P
>
> And, indeed, the very next time we see a Premiership player commit
> himself with a challenge deemed a little 'too much' for their
> liking.
>
> I mean, if it was really such a bad challenge, why didn't the ref'
> just send him off, on-the-spot?
> (Oh, shut up about Mike Riley, Scoper!)
because he was payed not too :P lol nah home bios is my guess it happens at united all too often
and mutu was a fool unto himself I hate drugs so my view is he deserves what he gets
Yes, the manly thing to do. (oh-ho-hooo...)
Not something you would ascociate with a Frenchman or some thugs, going back in-time about twelve-months...
:P
Not something you would ascociate with a Frenchman or some thugs, going back in-time about twelve-months...
:P
Yes, I'm still intrigued to see what on Earth they're gonna do with Adrian Mutu - and, hopefully (although, I may be asking just-too-much of them...), I'd like to think they'll have the matter settled this year!
:P
And, indeed, the very next time we see a Premiership player commit himself with a challenge deemed a little 'too much' for their liking.
I mean, if it was really such a bad challenge, why didn't the ref' just send him off, on-the-spot?
(Oh, shut up about Mike Riley, Scoper!)
:P
And, indeed, the very next time we see a Premiership player commit himself with a challenge deemed a little 'too much' for their liking.
I mean, if it was really such a bad challenge, why didn't the ref' just send him off, on-the-spot?
(Oh, shut up about Mike Riley, Scoper!)
but your all missing the point it was a nasty challenge he knew it was why he didnt contest it, and he appolgise too Ashley Cole later on which is the manly thing to do.
All it is is the FA trying to make themselves be seen as important while still getting back at United for ditching the FA cup a few years back (you just know that still harbours ill feeling at FA HQ)
First Rio and now Ruud, 2 of the finest players in their positions in the world, let alone England who better to teach a lesson but i bet you a million quid no one else will be punished if they do the same or similar thing.
all i can say is - Becks it's a good job you moved to Madrid otherwise they'd have got you to
First Rio and now Ruud, 2 of the finest players in their positions in the world, let alone England who better to teach a lesson but i bet you a million quid no one else will be punished if they do the same or similar thing.
all i can say is - Becks it's a good job you moved to Madrid otherwise they'd have got you to
I've seen that challenge several times over now, having never really noticed it during the live match - and yet, I still don't see what's so '3-match-ban-WRONG' about it...?
He had a better chance of getting the ball than one of the first-half challenges Gary Neville got away with, I do see that. Yes, he caught Cole's ankle, but was there really any intent of injuring the hated Arsénal full-back?
If it was a revenge mission, surely, he's have gone for Lauren or Patrick Vieira? Or, even, left early to hunt-down Martin Keown in Leicester....
If this was part of Fergie's so called "tactis" for the night, wouldn't Wayne Rooney have been the No.1 choice with intent-to-break?
The FA are only punishing him to try and 'even things out' after the handful of descisions within the match that favoured United to one extent or the other. A little like when they made a scpaegoat of Rio Ferdinand; by taking one of the club's - and, indeed, the league's - finest athletes, they feel they're making a point to those in disgust who find it so hard to just let go, all over again.
A three-match-ban is harsh, I feel. While it is nice to see them finally clamping-down on something like this - why start now, and not several frickin' years ago when it really all began?!?
:P
He had a better chance of getting the ball than one of the first-half challenges Gary Neville got away with, I do see that. Yes, he caught Cole's ankle, but was there really any intent of injuring the hated Arsénal full-back?
If it was a revenge mission, surely, he's have gone for Lauren or Patrick Vieira? Or, even, left early to hunt-down Martin Keown in Leicester....
If this was part of Fergie's so called "tactis" for the night, wouldn't Wayne Rooney have been the No.1 choice with intent-to-break?
The FA are only punishing him to try and 'even things out' after the handful of descisions within the match that favoured United to one extent or the other. A little like when they made a scpaegoat of Rio Ferdinand; by taking one of the club's - and, indeed, the league's - finest athletes, they feel they're making a point to those in disgust who find it so hard to just let go, all over again.
A three-match-ban is harsh, I feel. While it is nice to see them finally clamping-down on something like this - why start now, and not several frickin' years ago when it really all began?!?
:P
Quinty wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Because Fergie often makes it a habit to change clothes before doing
> interviews
>
> Oh, so that's hardcore evidence is it?
*browses through post hmmm.....ok*
Did i say it was hardcore evidence? Just merely a bit suspicious Fergie suddenly decides to change his clothes for no good reason.
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Because Fergie often makes it a habit to change clothes before doing
> interviews
>
> Oh, so that's hardcore evidence is it?
*browses through post hmmm.....ok*
Did i say it was hardcore evidence? Just merely a bit suspicious Fergie suddenly decides to change his clothes for no good reason.
lalakersrule wrote:
> Because Fergie often makes it a habit to change clothes before doing
> interviews
Oh, so that's hardcore evidence is it? Judging by the United players thinking they'd won the world cup, its much more plausible that it was in fact the jubilant United players going a bit crazy.
> Because Fergie often makes it a habit to change clothes before doing
> interviews
Oh, so that's hardcore evidence is it? Judging by the United players thinking they'd won the world cup, its much more plausible that it was in fact the jubilant United players going a bit crazy.
Page: