The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'StarFox 64'.
cmon people im interested in what you think of starfox and f-zero personally i like starfox .....
Page:
Tphi wrote:
> Dringo wrote:
> Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
>
> Microsoft are supporting it in other departments?
Sorry that was poor, I mean Microsoft are supporting it in terms of office/windows or whatever it is they're working on.
RARE are merely porting GBA games over to Gizmondo.
If Microsoft were REALLY supporting Gizmondo surly they wouldn't release the GBA edition of the It's Mr Pants and Banjo Pilot??? They aren't out yet after all!
Why can't Microsoft support 2 handhelds?
> Dringo wrote:
> Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
>
> Microsoft are supporting it in other departments?
Sorry that was poor, I mean Microsoft are supporting it in terms of office/windows or whatever it is they're working on.
RARE are merely porting GBA games over to Gizmondo.
If Microsoft were REALLY supporting Gizmondo surly they wouldn't release the GBA edition of the It's Mr Pants and Banjo Pilot??? They aren't out yet after all!
Why can't Microsoft support 2 handhelds?
Dringo wrote:
> Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
Microsoft are supporting it in other departments?
> Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
Microsoft are supporting it in other departments?
Gizmondo is being used in a different way to the DS, you've heard MS say it before. And besides after the initial batch of RARE titles there aren't a lot more the Gizmondo can do. What I mean is, after "It's Mr Pants" and whatever else they're doing the handheld team don't have any other games in development. Gizmondo is a relativly weak handheld.
Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
It looks incredibly likely that ports if N64 titles will be made on the DS, especially as Nintendo hold weight over DK64.
Microsoft are mainly supporting it in the software department.
It looks incredibly likely that ports if N64 titles will be made on the DS, especially as Nintendo hold weight over DK64.
Great minds think alike ^_^
Wow... this forum is so big...
I'm hearing a bit of an ECHO! :-P
I'm hearing a bit of an ECHO! :-P
Dringo wrote:
> There could well be a Perfect Dark DS!!!!
What is it with you and multiple puncuation lately? :S
Well there won't be as long as Microsoft stop Rare from supporting the DS. I doubt Rare don't support it out of choice, especially as most other major developers have had dev-kits for almost a year now? My guess is it's because MS are supporting Gizmondo. Maybe we'll see some Rare support when the Gizmondo totally fails.
Which means an announcement anyday now! :D
> There could well be a Perfect Dark DS!!!!
What is it with you and multiple puncuation lately? :S
Well there won't be as long as Microsoft stop Rare from supporting the DS. I doubt Rare don't support it out of choice, especially as most other major developers have had dev-kits for almost a year now? My guess is it's because MS are supporting Gizmondo. Maybe we'll see some Rare support when the Gizmondo totally fails.
Which means an announcement anyday now! :D
The thing is, Rare won't start develloping it until this Gizmondo thingamy is a confirmed flop (i.e. Microsoft admit it!) - and that's going to take atleast a year.
Or maybe MS will come round and let Rare devellop for the DS as well.
I think that Rare WANT to...
You kind of get that impression from the scribe whispers, don't you?
Or maybe MS will come round and let Rare devellop for the DS as well.
I think that Rare WANT to...
You kind of get that impression from the scribe whispers, don't you?
There could well be a Perfect Dark DS!!!!
gerrid wrote:
> We could have had a perfect Dark with the Goldeneye engine, and we
> ARE getting the EA Goldeneye anyway.
That is no consolation whatsoever!
Perfect Dark DS would have rocked though. :(
> We could have had a perfect Dark with the Goldeneye engine, and we
> ARE getting the EA Goldeneye anyway.
That is no consolation whatsoever!
Perfect Dark DS would have rocked though. :(
gerrid wrote:
> I'm sure they wouldn't buy the license. I'm sure it would cost A LOT
> of money and EA would not be willing to give it up, lucrative as it
> is. Nintendo/Rare would also have little ue for it, other than
> republishing Goldeneye.
EA own the license to James Bond, not any particular movie, the entire Bond franchise.
That's the problem, Nintendo just bought the Goldeneye license.
If EA don't re-new the license Nintendo can grab the license for a single movie.
It's strange.
> I'm sure they wouldn't buy the license. I'm sure it would cost A LOT
> of money and EA would not be willing to give it up, lucrative as it
> is. Nintendo/Rare would also have little ue for it, other than
> republishing Goldeneye.
EA own the license to James Bond, not any particular movie, the entire Bond franchise.
That's the problem, Nintendo just bought the Goldeneye license.
If EA don't re-new the license Nintendo can grab the license for a single movie.
It's strange.
Page: