Viewing Thread:
"Should have gone to Specsavers"

Exactly what is it with French managers and not being able to see certain things on a football pitch? First we had Arsene Wenger and his inability to see anything his Arsenal team did and now we have Jacques Santini with his whining and moaning (but then that's what the French do best :-D) about how it wasn't a penalty and Edman never touched good old O'Shea. Hmmm is that right froggie? Is that why most papers had a picture showing Edman trying to swap shirts with O'Shea before the match had even finished the following morning?


Get some new glasses lads, may help you to actually see things out on the pitch.

Heh if this is going down the route of you calling Ruud rubbish which is where it seems it's heading then you really are totally whacked out on drugs and not living in reality

lalakersrule wrote:
> You remember wrong then seeing as it was the same day when he was up
> town with Berkovic i think and he quickly phoned them up to ask if
> there was still time to go back but they refused for some reason even
> though he could have been back in time. He actually took the test two
> days later which is what you're getting confused with i think

Ok then, maybe unjustified, but the FA wanted to make an example of him, and I'm not complaining.

but if they ever decide to make an example of Defoe, King or Brown, I'll hate them for life, grrrr

No.

You only SCORED one.

The score was 1-0 wasn't it? And that was a penalty wasn't it?

Thank you.

Anyone can stand offside and poke a ball in the net, wait that's all RVN does, except sometimes he manages to get his lazy ass onside.

You remember wrong then seeing as it was the same day when he was up town with Berkovic i think and he quickly phoned them up to ask if there was still time to go back but they refused for some reason even though he could have been back in time. He actually took the test two days later which is what you're getting confused with i think

Kinda screws up your statement then of us only converting one chance then eh? :-D

lalakersrule wrote:
> Heh, 2 hours or whatever the difference was would not be long enough
> for the effects of any drug to wear off.

If I remember correctly it was a few days later.

He was offside....

Should have stayed onside, shouldn't he.

Yea because Ruud didn't have a goal disallowed did he

Lil Bro wrote:
> In the time it took him to come back it could have worn off....


Heh, 2 hours or whatever the difference was would not be long enough for the effects of performance enhancing drug to wear off, when it all kicked off they had experts on Sky telling us that

Probably paying you back for being a scum fan