Viewing Thread:
"Should have gone to Specsavers"

Exactly what is it with French managers and not being able to see certain things on a football pitch? First we had Arsene Wenger and his inability to see anything his Arsenal team did and now we have Jacques Santini with his whining and moaning (but then that's what the French do best :-D) about how it wasn't a penalty and Edman never touched good old O'Shea. Hmmm is that right froggie? Is that why most papers had a picture showing Edman trying to swap shirts with O'Shea before the match had even finished the following morning?


Get some new glasses lads, may help you to actually see things out on the pitch.

Let me just make a call to the men in special white suits, they'll take you to a safe place :-D

Yes. :p

Lil Bro wrote:
> Personally I'd rather have Defoe, who scores scorchers every few weeks
> and a consistently good number of goals (obv not Henry/RVn numbers).


You'd rather have Defoe then Ruud??

No. I'm not complaining about RIO, because I don't care about him, I would care if it's a spurs player. It's just being biased, not hypocritic.

Personally I'd rather have Defoe, who scores scorchers every few weeks and a consistently good number of goals (obv not Henry/RVn numbers).

Lil Bro wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
>
> Ok then, maybe unjustified, but the FA wanted to make an example of
> him, and I'm not complaining.
>
> but if they ever decide to make an example of Defoe, King or Brown,
> I'll hate them for life, grrrr
>
>
> and that makes you a hypocrite
>
> I don't believe it does, no contradictory statements there...


Do you even know what that word means? You said you're not complaining about the FA making an unfair example out of Rio yet if they did the same to Defoe, King or Brown you'd be angry. That sir makes you a hypocrite

Lil Bro wrote:

> Lol, how can even I call Ruud rubbish?
>
> It'd be like calling Michael Brown good.
>
> Just commenting on the vast number of tap ins/penalties he scores.


Still has to be there does he not? His reading of the game is fantastic.

If you ask any fan what would they rather have in their team - a striker who scores 5 scorchers a season or a striker who scores 30 boring tap ins a season, the sensible ones would pick 30 goal boy.

lalakersrule wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
>
> Ok then, maybe unjustified, but the FA wanted to make an example of
> him, and I'm not complaining.
>
> but if they ever decide to make an example of Defoe, King or Brown,
> I'll hate them for life, grrrr
>
>
> and that makes you a hypocrite

I don't believe it does, no contradictory statements there...

lalakersrule wrote:
> Heh if this is going down the route of you calling Ruud rubbish which
> is where it seems it's heading then you really are totally whacked
> out on drugs and not living in reality

Lol, how can even I call Ruud rubbish?

It'd be like calling Michael Brown good.

Just commenting on the vast number of tap ins/penalties he scores.

Lil Bro wrote:

> Ok then, maybe unjustified, but the FA wanted to make an example of
> him, and I'm not complaining.
>
> but if they ever decide to make an example of Defoe, King or Brown,
> I'll hate them for life, grrrr


and that makes you a hypocrite