Viewing Thread:
"purity and chastity"

One thing that really astonishes me is the number of people who sleep around in the world today. For those of us among us who believe in the Bibile, sex outside marriage is forbidden, yet so many people, religeous and otherwise, see it their duty to have multiple sexual partners. Its only a symbol of social standing in some places in AFRICA. How can we call ourselves the civilised world when we see fit to stick our john thomas in every place we can think of. Its level with the animals, and even some of them have the decency to confine themselves to one partner. (i.e. swans)

Im not trying to push chastity and say all sexual acticity is WRONG outside marriage, but I really think that sex and similar acts are something that you should share with only someone special. The only purpose of one night stands is to get some POONTANG with whatever skank can be found on the street. (I dont mean to degrade women, I just have to write this from the male perspective, the same applies to women)

Chastity generally means that you dont do ANYTHING sexual at all outside of marraige. Personally I dont see whats wrong with a little frolic in the garden of eden if its legal, legal by the bible, and doesnt put your future in jeprody through inadvertant pregnancy. What happens if the chick you boned on a one night stand get knocked up? Its your obligation to raise the b*****d child, and wed the whench. lol. I just enjoy using biassed language. I'll stop now.

Since (as I have been informed by a good friend of mine whos a history guru) the general practise of prolific intercourse has been going on for millenia, were not really doing anything different, however if we didnt do anything different we'd still be eating leaves, not even using tools. Evolution and invention meant progress, technological and personal. Sleeping around like this means that sex isnt sacred. It becomes meaningless when you finally meet someone you marry, and all you can do is compare them to your previous partners.

I know Im on a losing side. Most of you are probably against me, but Id just like you to consider the idea of, not chastity, but, however hard it may be, not sleeping around. If you meet someone special to you, by all means, even if its not the first. At least then its actually meaningful. But having shallow, meaningless sex is....well...m**********g. YOU'LL GO BLIND SON!!

Trish wrote:
> Fozz wrote:
> The truth
> is you cant prove that animals love, heck, you cant even prove that
> humans love, maybe there is no such things as love.
>
> That kind of blows your whole debate into nothing then, doesnt it.


Indeed, if you were arguing that sleeping around is wrong from a spiritual point and that spirituality that doesn't come into it then neither does morality then it's just biology and human nature.

Fozz wrote:
> Although some animals do have one partner for their entire lives (as I
> pointed out on a previous post) is there really scientific proof of
> love between these?

When you are around animals long enough you see it, thats all the proof you need.

Sure a dog will lbe attached its owner, but do
> animals really experience the romantic love that humans do?

Youve never seen one animal pining for its mate when it has died? Or even heard of it happening?

The truth
> is you cant prove that animals love, heck, you cant even prove that
> humans love, maybe there is no such things as love.

That kind of blows your whole debate into nothing then, doesnt it.

I think she right about that FFF, pretty much everyone I know has had (or is planning to have) more than 1 sexual partner, so I think its pretty fair to stereotype the population like that. Id like to know the actualy percentage of us who arent heading down that road.

Although some animals do have one partner for their entire lives (as I pointed out on a previous post) is there really scientific proof of love between these? Sure a dog will lbe attached its owner, but do animals really experience the romantic love that humans do? The truth is you cant prove that animals love, heck, you cant even prove that humans love, maybe there is no such things as love.

Way to stereotype the entire population.
Don't expect different treatment back.

Fozz wrote:
> Wel flock (I like your tagline btw) thats what makes you and me
> different. I dont differentiate between sex and love that much. Sure,
> animals have sex without love but they dont love at all. Thats what
> makes humans different.

Actually Fozz its well known that animals do love, indeed some animals have only the one mate their entire lives, more than can be said for most humans. Get your facts straight.

Excelllleeennt. This section beat sport.

(does the funky chicken)

Ah yes. I remember years ago when that was on.

wlt = worlds longest thread, its in prime

WLT? Motoring? huh? I think I was absent that day.