The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
so what will be best? PS3 XBOX REVOLOUTION DS or PSP?
Page:
Tphi wrote:
> True, although the Final Fantasy name is pretty highly respected too.
> Apart from the odd game in the series that was crap..
I didn't mean that. What I mean is that it is like a Zelda game and not a Final Fantasy game.
> True, although the Final Fantasy name is pretty highly respected too.
> Apart from the odd game in the series that was crap..
I didn't mean that. What I mean is that it is like a Zelda game and not a Final Fantasy game.
well ok maybe there not dated for a handheld.
chatterbox wrote:
> Will the DS have gameboy advance style graphics aswel or only 3D, i
> think the N64 graphics are a bit dated even on a handheld
Whateverrrrr
> Will the DS have gameboy advance style graphics aswel or only 3D, i
> think the N64 graphics are a bit dated even on a handheld
Whateverrrrr
True, although the Final Fantasy name is pretty highly respected too. Apart from the odd game in the series that was crap..
Tphi wrote:
> The only difference being Four Swords probably (can't judge, haven't
> played) has a single-player worth playing, unlike FF:CC.
And that's a major difference :)
Oh and the fact that this is a Zelda game, and it is what you expect from a Zelda game.
> The only difference being Four Swords probably (can't judge, haven't
> played) has a single-player worth playing, unlike FF:CC.
And that's a major difference :)
Oh and the fact that this is a Zelda game, and it is what you expect from a Zelda game.
The only difference being Four Swords probably (can't judge, haven't played) has a single-player worth playing, unlike FF:CC.
Tphi wrote:
> To be honest I count RPGs as games I can enjoy and immerse myself in
> to get away from everything and certainly not as games I'd invite
> people over to play and have a laugh with. That's what TimeSplitters
> and Wario Ware are for. You must feel different *shrugs*.
Then don't expect an RPG and you'll be alright won't you.
It's a communication game, it's one of the finest examples of co-operative play anywhere, matched by Four Swords... naturally.
> To be honest I count RPGs as games I can enjoy and immerse myself in
> to get away from everything and certainly not as games I'd invite
> people over to play and have a laugh with. That's what TimeSplitters
> and Wario Ware are for. You must feel different *shrugs*.
Then don't expect an RPG and you'll be alright won't you.
It's a communication game, it's one of the finest examples of co-operative play anywhere, matched by Four Swords... naturally.
Will the DS have gameboy advance style graphics aswel or only 3D, i think the N64 graphics are a bit dated even on a handheld
To be honest I count RPGs as games I can enjoy and immerse myself in to get away from everything and certainly not as games I'd invite people over to play and have a laugh with. That's what TimeSplitters and Wario Ware are for. You must feel different *shrugs*.
But it's the multiplayer where it rules. The fact you didn't play it is your problem. The game is so much fun playing with ya mate, you are forced to communicate and you can annoy eachother with the little footballs and what not.
I should really go back to it.
I should really go back to it.
Page: