The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think I've downloaded the contents of a DVD, although I'm not sure.
I have a .m3u , a .nfo and a .sfv.. is that all I need to m,ake a DVD, and if so.. how the funk do I do it? :-)
I have a .m3u , a .nfo and a .sfv.. is that all I need to m,ake a DVD, and if so.. how the funk do I do it? :-)
Page:
Thank you. And I'm 16.
By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one post? It's just blatant spamming.
By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one post? It's just blatant spamming.
Reefer wrote:
> No need, when there's XVid compression that can compress a film down
> into a high-quality 700MB file. Or he's got a 4.7GB-rip, which is
> become very popular nowadays.
Ali boy, correct about rar.
700mb films are crap quality, ok some are just about watchable, but no matter what you say you cannot compress a full dvd down to 1 cd and have great quality, why didn't they just do it in the first place?
Also if the files are vob, bup and ifo then that is pretty much the end process of backing up your DVD, just use a program like nero to burn the files. Make sure you drag all the vob, bup and ifo files into the video-ts folder.
When you say a full DVD 4.7gb has become very popular these days, what exactly do you mean?
Because if it's a 4.7gb rip, then it's not a rip as it is the whole film, so it's just a backup/copy.
No?
> No need, when there's XVid compression that can compress a film down
> into a high-quality 700MB file. Or he's got a 4.7GB-rip, which is
> become very popular nowadays.
Ali boy, correct about rar.
700mb films are crap quality, ok some are just about watchable, but no matter what you say you cannot compress a full dvd down to 1 cd and have great quality, why didn't they just do it in the first place?
Also if the files are vob, bup and ifo then that is pretty much the end process of backing up your DVD, just use a program like nero to burn the files. Make sure you drag all the vob, bup and ifo files into the video-ts folder.
When you say a full DVD 4.7gb has become very popular these days, what exactly do you mean?
Because if it's a 4.7gb rip, then it's not a rip as it is the whole film, so it's just a backup/copy.
No?
Reefer wrote:
> Thank you. And I'm 16.
Yey, me to.
> By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one
> post? It's just blatant spamming.
LOL, so true :P
> Thank you. And I'm 16.
Yey, me to.
> By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one
> post? It's just blatant spamming.
LOL, so true :P
It's just blatant spamming.
y thank u i do try
p.s. me 17 u younger get the point
any way u no quite alot about divx and all so i think u should come to mine and smok a few and talk all noing like we no something
something
y thank u i do try
p.s. me 17 u younger get the point
any way u no quite alot about divx and all so i think u should come to mine and smok a few and talk all noing like we no something
something
ÈL ® ö B ì Ñ no's more oh no
do u smoke pot
do u smoke pot
ÈL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> No need, when there's XVid compression that can compress a film down
> into a high-quality 700MB file. Or he's got a 4.7GB-rip, which is
> become very popular nowadays.
>
> Ali boy, correct about rar.
>
> 700mb films are crap quality, ok some are just about watchable, but
> no matter what you say you cannot compress a full dvd down to 1 cd
> and have great quality, why didn't they just do it in the first
> place?
>
> Also if the files are vob, bup and ifo then that is pretty much the
> end process of backing up your DVD, just use a program like nero to
> burn the files. Make sure you drag all the vob, bup and ifo files
> into the video-ts folder.
>
> When you say a full DVD 4.7gb has become very popular these days,
> what exactly do you mean?
> Because if it's a 4.7gb rip, then it's not a rip as it is the whole
> film, so it's just a backup/copy.
>
> No?
Firstly, I can take a screenshot of a 700MB XVid I have on my hard drive. The quality is very close to DVD, to the point where most people cannot tell the difference.
And regarding "becoming popular", I can direct you to a rather famous warez site where there's a LOAD of these posted, and the ammount of seeds/leechers is pretty damn high.
But the point here is that the guy said he downloaded a DVD, so he must've download the 4.7GB image file that someone has ripped from their retail DVD.
> Reefer wrote:
> No need, when there's XVid compression that can compress a film down
> into a high-quality 700MB file. Or he's got a 4.7GB-rip, which is
> become very popular nowadays.
>
> Ali boy, correct about rar.
>
> 700mb films are crap quality, ok some are just about watchable, but
> no matter what you say you cannot compress a full dvd down to 1 cd
> and have great quality, why didn't they just do it in the first
> place?
>
> Also if the files are vob, bup and ifo then that is pretty much the
> end process of backing up your DVD, just use a program like nero to
> burn the files. Make sure you drag all the vob, bup and ifo files
> into the video-ts folder.
>
> When you say a full DVD 4.7gb has become very popular these days,
> what exactly do you mean?
> Because if it's a 4.7gb rip, then it's not a rip as it is the whole
> film, so it's just a backup/copy.
>
> No?
Firstly, I can take a screenshot of a 700MB XVid I have on my hard drive. The quality is very close to DVD, to the point where most people cannot tell the difference.
And regarding "becoming popular", I can direct you to a rather famous warez site where there's a LOAD of these posted, and the ammount of seeds/leechers is pretty damn high.
But the point here is that the guy said he downloaded a DVD, so he must've download the 4.7GB image file that someone has ripped from their retail DVD.
ÈL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> Thank you. And I'm 16.
>
> Yey, me to.
>
>
> By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one
> post? It's just blatant spamming.
>
> LOL, so true :P
Heh, but still, that little guy doesn't geddit :0D
> Reefer wrote:
> Thank you. And I'm 16.
>
> Yey, me to.
>
>
> By the way, couldn't you have included all of those posts in one
> post? It's just blatant spamming.
>
> LOL, so true :P
Heh, but still, that little guy doesn't geddit :0D
what's wrong with
s
s
p
a
Page: