> Don't forget that every now and again we have to wait a while for a
> staffie to leave before they can get elected.
> Lets see, 4 notables a year. Currently 22 notables. 50 - 22 = 28.
> 28/4 = 7 years.
> Do you seriously expect to still be on these forums in 7 years time?
I already said in a previous post I dont even intend to be here in another year let alone 7. No point in doing calculations. If it was 4 notables a year that would make the forum over a year older than it actually is. I'm sure there will be multiple notables again on a single election.
Not long till the 23rd notable anyway.
> You don't want to have 50 Notables in a couple of years
Lets see, 4 notables a year. Currently 22 notables. 50 - 22 = 28. 28/4 = 7 years.
Do you seriously expect to still be on these forums in 7 years time?
> That's all open for debate, RBS.
> I personally think he's been wasting company money in lavish hotels
> making 'private' movies for 'feetfeetfeet.com'
Weird, that is actually a website.
Hmmmm that's not a bad idea, we could vote the five in again and it'll be reflective of the modern day society... after 3 years the notable system resets.
Grix Thraves wrote:
> And at LAST someone uses their imagination!
.. and I'd tried so very, very, VERY, hard!
Told you I was just kidding. My ego isn't really that fragile.
Um.. how did I do that anyway?