The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
its the egg... please prove me wrong.
Page:
Well spotted :)
Wait, don't answer that. The answer's pretty obvious I guess.
But it's practically scientific fact, like gravity.
But it's practically scientific fact, like gravity.
Wasn't this covered in an episode of Friends?
What? How can you "not believe" in evolution?
The chicken went to an orgy the other week, and as eggs don't have reproductive organs, I believe the chicken came first.
I'm so, so desperately sorry.
I'm so, so desperately sorry.
Go knock one out with your crucifix Bible face!
Neither came first. God just zapped them into life 'n' stuff.
Galacticdramon wrote:
> No matter whether someone believes the Evolution theory or the
> Creation theory, it should still be the Chicken either way.
Precisely. Except the Creationist stand point, makes a lot more sense.
Observe;
1) The Chicken was CREATED
2) The Chicken had eggs
Now isn't that simpler?
> No matter whether someone believes the Evolution theory or the
> Creation theory, it should still be the Chicken either way.
Precisely. Except the Creationist stand point, makes a lot more sense.
Observe;
1) The Chicken was CREATED
2) The Chicken had eggs
Now isn't that simpler?
Why is it always the chicken and the egg?
What about the radio or the speaker . . . or some thing . . .
I couldn't think of any thing else
What about the radio or the speaker . . . or some thing . . .
I couldn't think of any thing else
Meka Dragon wrote:
> To be honest, it depends on your defenition of egg. Is an egg the egg
> of what laid it, or of what is inside?
>
> You see, the way evolution goes, something would have evolved into a
> chicken from a non-chicken creature. The non-chicken lay an egg from
> which a chicken hatched.
I was discussing the EXACT same thing with someone on msn the other week. I've forgotten their SR name.
> To be honest, it depends on your defenition of egg. Is an egg the egg
> of what laid it, or of what is inside?
>
> You see, the way evolution goes, something would have evolved into a
> chicken from a non-chicken creature. The non-chicken lay an egg from
> which a chicken hatched.
I was discussing the EXACT same thing with someone on msn the other week. I've forgotten their SR name.
Page: