Viewing Thread:
"In the next notable election...."

We should be able to vote a Notable OUT. Out on his ass I say. Let's face it, half of them hardly appear on the board as much as they did when they were first voted in. They were given their status because they make the forum a "fun place to come and visit" as the Notable definition says, but the majority of them hardly visit themselves, let alone make it fun for others. As such, we should be able to vote them off and give them a good old fashioned booing, like some sort of forum pantomime.


What say you regular folk?

Heh, that one post right there only got you there. At time of writing I was most correct.

;-)

I think I'm in the top 40.

I agree, for one. They are supposed to be the "elite" and set an example for the rest of the forum. And whilst most of them do this there are one or two completely unheard of to some.

I mean, just glance at the Top 100 posters, only one Notable is in the top 40, and that is newly elected Tim! Surely being in the top 40 is an attribute that attracts votes, as the four/five main candidates for the last election are all right up there. I say get to 25 Notables and stick with 25, or less if need be.

We should be able to vote a Notable OUT. Out on his ass I say. Let's face it, half of them hardly appear on the board as much as they did when they were first voted in. They were given their status because they make the forum a "fun place to come and visit" as the Notable definition says, but the majority of them hardly visit themselves, let alone make it fun for others. As such, we should be able to vote them off and give them a good old fashioned booing, like some sort of forum pantomime.


What say you regular folk?