> go back to your cave with the over sad wrestling lovers...jamessss
Oh, because I've caned you to ashes and shown you to be an ignorant sno-weasel?
Or is it because you have no reply? Or is it because you're wrong?
Or all the above?
> they dont get choked out. they may make u think that but your
> guliable... JIM NICE BUT DIM
HAHAHAHAH U IZ FUNNAH
Except, people do get legitmately choked out. Ever seen Mark Briscoe face Samoa Joe in Ring of Honor? Erm, NOPE. Briscoe got choked until he was purple by Joe, BUT WAIT, it was clever because all they did was shine a purple light in Mark's face! Yeah, NATCH!
I IZ REAL DIM HAHAH LOL
> WHAT DO U SEE.. it is really for 8-16 year olds who like pretend
> violenceE.. HOW OLD ARE YOU...YOU COULD COMPARE IT TO THE POWER
> RANGERS OR NINJA TURTLES.. LOL
Yes, that's exactly what we compare it to.
We totally ignore the fact that one involves performing in front of live crowds and the other is filmed in the safety of a studio.
We also ignore the fact that one is pretend (Power Rangers, if you haven't already guessed), whilst the other has people really falling onto their backs, getting hit in the face or getting choked out.
We also ignore that Power Rangers is focused solely on story-telling, whereas the other is about telling a story in the ring.
But hey, that's the kind of weird, reclusive, homosexual under-16 wimps we are, right BRICKY?
> why dont u ever see wrestliing on the back
> page of the newspaper... why because there is more people interested
> in football
So more people being interested in football than wrestling automatically makes wrestling rubbish? You really are talking utter guff, friend.
More people buy into pop stuff like the Cheeky Girls than Beethoven or musical geniuses like him nowadays, yet which type of music is superior? No, it's not the Cheeky Girls, dunce.
Wrestling's an acquired taste, we know that, but that's not to say it's rubbish, is it? No, it's to say that you might not like it, but that's because we see something ni it that you may not.