The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
How the f**k do you do algorithms?
Page:
Poop.
:D
:D
Paradox: wrote:
> I put input/output for b(i), because I had no idea whatsoever.
Yeah, a couple of my friends put that as well, you'll probably get the mark.
> I put input/output for b(i), because I had no idea whatsoever.
Yeah, a couple of my friends put that as well, you'll probably get the mark.
Microchips wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
>
> So you should've got
>
> 24 1
> 24 2
> 57 3
> 57 4
>
> *dies and goes to heaven*
>
> Winnar!
>
> And the funny thing is, I was the only one who got the right answer,
> out of the 5 people I talked to anyway.
>
> Success!
I honestly thought it was easy. We'd done a bunch of trace tables and past papers and they'd all been harder than that!
> Paradox: wrote:
>
> So you should've got
>
> 24 1
> 24 2
> 57 3
> 57 4
>
> *dies and goes to heaven*
>
> Winnar!
>
> And the funny thing is, I was the only one who got the right answer,
> out of the 5 people I talked to anyway.
>
> Success!
I honestly thought it was easy. We'd done a bunch of trace tables and past papers and they'd all been harder than that!
I put input/output for b(i), because I had no idea whatsoever.
I put Disk Controller for that one
Oh yeah, remember the question with the diagram that said "Name parts b(i) and b(ii)"
I said b(i) was the Cache, and b(ii) was a network card. I'm pretty sure about the Network card, but not the Cache...
I said b(i) was the Cache, and b(ii) was a network card. I'm pretty sure about the Network card, but not the Cache...
The thing that threw me was the fact that "Result" was not an array
Paradox: wrote:
> So you should've got
>
> 24 1
> 24 2
> 57 3
> 57 4
*dies and goes to heaven*
Winnar!
And the funny thing is, I was the only one who got the right answer, out of the 5 people I talked to anyway.
Success!
> So you should've got
>
> 24 1
> 24 2
> 57 3
> 57 4
*dies and goes to heaven*
Winnar!
And the funny thing is, I was the only one who got the right answer, out of the 5 people I talked to anyway.
Success!
gamesfreak wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
> How the f**k do you do algorithms?
>
> I failed that question as well.
I got it right, I posted the "How the f**k do you do algorithms?" before the exam. I found the actual algorithm pretty simple.
All you did was:
Set the index and result to zero.
if the result (zero) was less than the index (24), you copied the index into the result. Then did the same again.
So you should've got
24 1
24 2
57 3
57 4
> Paradox: wrote:
> How the f**k do you do algorithms?
>
> I failed that question as well.
I got it right, I posted the "How the f**k do you do algorithms?" before the exam. I found the actual algorithm pretty simple.
All you did was:
Set the index and result to zero.
if the result (zero) was less than the index (24), you copied the index into the result. Then did the same again.
So you should've got
24 1
24 2
57 3
57 4
Microchips wrote:
> What exam board did you have?
>
> We had AQA.
Yeah I had AQA too.
> The First paper- programming and networks etc, they gave marks away!
> Literally!
I know, I almost laughed, seriously. The algorithm was purrrrrrfectly easy.
> Second paper was slighter harder, but still, it was easy!
I agree, the census thing and another part were a bit tricky.
> What exam board did you have?
>
> We had AQA.
Yeah I had AQA too.
> The First paper- programming and networks etc, they gave marks away!
> Literally!
I know, I almost laughed, seriously. The algorithm was purrrrrrfectly easy.
> Second paper was slighter harder, but still, it was easy!
I agree, the census thing and another part were a bit tricky.
Page: