The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just to let you all know where my allegiance stands.
I'm so going to enjoy posting in this forum at half nine on Sunday.
I'm so going to enjoy posting in this forum at half nine on Sunday.
Page:
Anyone watching uefa stories on ITV?
Amazing how different players looked 4 years ago!
Amazing how different players looked 4 years ago!
EMERGENCY! We have a traitor.
This euro crap sucks anyway. How can you have a tourny without the likes of Argentina and Brazil :P
----------------
Anyway, despite my usual reluctance to support England, i shall be a neutral in this game as i despise the French just as much.
----------------
Anyway, despite my usual reluctance to support England, i shall be a neutral in this game as i despise the French just as much.
Azul wrote:
> Aah, dear child, such remarks have no effect on me.
>
> I'm Scottish.
>
> Win, lose or draw, we party. It's all about the football, baby.
They play football?
> Aah, dear child, such remarks have no effect on me.
>
> I'm Scottish.
>
> Win, lose or draw, we party. It's all about the football, baby.
They play football?
I'll be supporting England, and I'm Scottish.
=D
Virtuoso wrote:
> But that match was two-legs AJ, of which, we went through by virtue of
> beating Scotland 2-0 at Hampden only 4 days previous ;)
Pfft, it was obviously a fluke. Paul Scholes scored, for christ's sake. :-D
Anyway, I said 'match', not 'two-legged match'... :-P
> But that match was two-legs AJ, of which, we went through by virtue of
> beating Scotland 2-0 at Hampden only 4 days previous ;)
Pfft, it was obviously a fluke. Paul Scholes scored, for christ's sake. :-D
Anyway, I said 'match', not 'two-legged match'... :-P
Yes, we won overall.
And rule.
And rule.
But that match was two-legs AJ, of which, we went through by virtue of beating Scotland 2-0 at Hampden only 4 days previous ;)
It might make you chuckle, but it's a perfectly acceptable way of looking at the situation. It's generally how we look at things these days...
For example, Monaco are better than Chelsea, even although Chelsea came 2nd in their league while Monaco came 3rd in theirs, despite the Premiership being considered a more difficult league. Just because Monaco beat Chelsea.
Almost same situation here. Okay, so maybe there is a little difference, but my argument is based around pretty much the same point. England might qualify for more tournaments and progress further at them, but last time we met, Scotland beat England. Therefore Scotland are currently better than England. Simple as that. Player quality or past achievements matter naff all in this argument, and by introducing them the point is being completely avoided.
For example, Monaco are better than Chelsea, even although Chelsea came 2nd in their league while Monaco came 3rd in theirs, despite the Premiership being considered a more difficult league. Just because Monaco beat Chelsea.
Almost same situation here. Okay, so maybe there is a little difference, but my argument is based around pretty much the same point. England might qualify for more tournaments and progress further at them, but last time we met, Scotland beat England. Therefore Scotland are currently better than England. Simple as that. Player quality or past achievements matter naff all in this argument, and by introducing them the point is being completely avoided.
Page: