The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Before I start, I want you to know I'm not being bitter. Not at all. I'm simply utterly confused, bamboozled, bemused, bewildered - whatever. I instantly know as I type this, I'll get the flourish of "omg ur jst cryin cuz u dint win!1".
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Page:
"what happened to the cute azully that giggled and cained my gingerness"
Puberty.
Now he's a bitter teenager who's angry at his dad.
Puberty.
Now he's a bitter teenager who's angry at his dad.
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> If you're stupid enough to spend a week of revision time drawing a
> picture of Tony for some dumb little competition, then you don't
> deserve to win, moron. And if wasn't down to who drew the best, most
> realistic drawing. It was whose was the most fun.
Snuggly, you already won a GAD for your thread, you don't need to suck up to your old work-mates any more ;D
> If you're stupid enough to spend a week of revision time drawing a
> picture of Tony for some dumb little competition, then you don't
> deserve to win, moron. And if wasn't down to who drew the best, most
> realistic drawing. It was whose was the most fun.
Snuggly, you already won a GAD for your thread, you don't need to suck up to your old work-mates any more ;D
I gotta say Para's entries looked really crap. They're not even 'fun' they could easily have just been lifted out of some random 5 year olds art folder.
Azul shouldn't necessarily of won though either. Nice picture and all but a bit....boring?
Azul shouldn't necessarily of won though either. Nice picture and all but a bit....boring?
Azul's a big hufter
sheppy, please change your tagline for it sickens me.
:D
Propa
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> I gotta say Para's entries looked really crap. They're not even 'fun'
> they could easily have just been lifted out of some random 5 year
> olds art folder.
>
> Azul shouldn't necessarily of won though either. Nice picture and all
> but a bit....boring?
Does this bode well for me? :-)
> I gotta say Para's entries looked really crap. They're not even 'fun'
> they could easily have just been lifted out of some random 5 year
> olds art folder.
>
> Azul shouldn't necessarily of won though either. Nice picture and all
> but a bit....boring?
Does this bode well for me? :-)
As I've said - there is no circumstance where Para should've won.
hehe, Azul lost.
I bet he soooooo thought he'd won it.
I bet he soooooo thought he'd won it.
Page: