The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Before I start, I want you to know I'm not being bitter. Not at all. I'm simply utterly confused, bamboozled, bemused, bewildered - whatever. I instantly know as I type this, I'll get the flourish of "omg ur jst cryin cuz u dint win!1".
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Page:
SHEEPY wrote:
> I think Paradox's pictures were excellent.
Wash your mouth sheepy.
> I think Paradox's pictures were excellent.
Wash your mouth sheepy.
J Nash wrote:
> Things I have learned today:
>
> 1. http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG
Im sorry Nash, but the second viewing i have just subjected myself was too much. Goodbye cruel world!
*Sails into the west*
> Things I have learned today:
>
> 1. http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG
Im sorry Nash, but the second viewing i have just subjected myself was too much. Goodbye cruel world!
*Sails into the west*
I think Paradox's pictures were excellent.
Things I have learned today:
1. http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG
2. It would appear that no one can spell loser.
1. http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG
2. It would appear that no one can spell loser.
Edgy wrote:
> Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
Thanks. It all becomes clear. A fantastic drawing that deserved to win IMHO.
> Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
Thanks. It all becomes clear. A fantastic drawing that deserved to win IMHO.
In the end of the day it wasn't up to you...
Special Reserve give away the games - special reserve choose who the hell to ...
It weren't you
Nah nicky na na...
Deal with it.
There is no point ripping the person who won to bits as - *ahem* he is the one with the gameaday!?
So can we all stop bitching,
stop brown nosing
stop even bothering to make justice out of this sorry cause
Congratulate the winner with gritted teeth and move on from the mourning of your loss...
Special Reserve give away the games - special reserve choose who the hell to ...
It weren't you
Nah nicky na na...
Deal with it.
There is no point ripping the person who won to bits as - *ahem* he is the one with the gameaday!?
So can we all stop bitching,
stop brown nosing
stop even bothering to make justice out of this sorry cause
Congratulate the winner with gritted teeth and move on from the mourning of your loss...
Look the EGAD simply wouldn't of been fair if it was about artistic talent. If it was you, Azul would be winning every one as I think yours was better then Paradox's. But who cares? Did you lose anything unwilingly? No so stop complaining theres always another day where the staffies can give you a free game.
Edgy wrote:
> Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
People should be made to take a Tonty test before they begin to comment about SR staffies.
> Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
People should be made to take a Tonty test before they begin to comment about SR staffies.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Good to see that your disappointment of not winning has left your
> cheerful character intact.
Nothing to with it, I'm merely stating the truth.
> Good to see that your disappointment of not winning has left your
> cheerful character intact.
Nothing to with it, I'm merely stating the truth.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> But, lt me get this straight. Was this for the "Draw the
> staff" competition? Sure, your drawing (Azul) is quite an
> excellent pencil sketch, but it's of Tony Hart. Paradox's are at
> least a member of staff. I'm confused.............
>
> [edit] Ahhh "tonty". (tontysketch.jpg) Sorry, I thought it
> was Tony. Hmmm. Still confused.
Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
> But, lt me get this straight. Was this for the "Draw the
> staff" competition? Sure, your drawing (Azul) is quite an
> excellent pencil sketch, but it's of Tony Hart. Paradox's are at
> least a member of staff. I'm confused.............
>
> [edit] Ahhh "tonty". (tontysketch.jpg) Sorry, I thought it
> was Tony. Hmmm. Still confused.
Tony Rainbird, Special Reserve's Managing Director...
Page: