The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you saw the ending of Zone of Enders, with the last boss(Anubis) being a Jehuty as well as the original which was indestructable and the ending just with Leo managing to get to the cargo ship and not taking part on the suicide mission to blow up the military base on Mars, its seems that there must be a sequeal, especially when Ada remarks before you fight Anubis - "We are not destined to fight yet..."- it must mean that a sequel is planed, what do you think?
Page:
1. I bet my right arm there will be a MGS3 (I'm left handed anyway.....)
2.Just checking that ZOE is good.
2.Just checking that ZOE is good.
There'll be no MGS3 - allegedly.
And yes, ZOE is actually very good.
And yes, ZOE is actually very good.
Wouldn't ZOE2 just be sold with the fact that the MGS3 demo would be bundled? (Is ZOE really that good that it sold so much, or is it just MGS2?.......)
chilled maff, now there`s a name I haven`t heard in a loonnng time.
Well of course I know him. He`s me.
Well actually not, but anyway, to the point - I don`t see you around so much these days.
Well of course I know him. He`s me.
Well actually not, but anyway, to the point - I don`t see you around so much these days.
I hope there is a sequal, as I think that game is a brilliant piece of work! I never expected to be playing a game like this until the rental showed me how good it was, and then I was hooked. I did not expect to manage to survive through Viola and Anubis first time, but with Viola I came very close to dying, just one more shot would have put me out. That is a game that shows just how good the PS2 can be when games companies put there minds to it!
When will there be a next game as good or better than this!?
When will there be a next game as good or better than this!?
Sounds like fun, though I doubt Hideo Kojima would want to say there is anything better than MGS2.
What would ZOE2 be called. ZOE2 sounds no good, so wat about listing your suggestions here.
Whatever you can think of : e.g The Search for Jehuty or whatever.
Whatever you can think of : e.g The Search for Jehuty or whatever.
savatt1668 wrote:
> Others will no doubt disagree with me, but I don't see much point in
> picking up Quake 3 of UT when the playstation can't offer the online
> capability. Don't get me wrong, they're fun multiplayer games, but
> to me they're weak as 1 player games.
All you do is run around
> fragging the comp again and again and the satisfaction of it soon
> wears off. It would be so much better if they they had a storylined
> 1 player game to keep you busy, but really this is only worth buying
> if you have loads of friends to play it with. Cause if you have the
> same 3 friends over, that'll soon become repetitive too. The good
> thing about the online option on the Dreamcast was that you got to
> meet different people with different ways of playing and different
> levels of skill.
I really think it was a mistake for Sony to
> have these out before the PS2 gets its modem. I'm no fan of
> Timesplitters personally, but that is the kind of FPS game that
> keeps you busy along with the likes of Doom and Goldeneye. All had
> they're problem solving elements like collecting keys or having to
> do certain things while blasting your way through hordes of enemies.
> Then once your mates were over, you could goto the multiplayer and
> have a laugh on that. And thats really what Quake 3 and UT are, FPS
> with the main game taken out leaving just the multiplayer option.
>
I personally have played on Quake 3 and UT for the PC and didnt use it on the internet as
a) Didnt really want to spend time playing on the net
b)Copied games and sometimes they dont work for the online games.
I found the one player game to be fun, I could easily spend hours on the game. Also I spent hours on Timesplitters multiplayer using the Bots.
I think online gaming is good but I still like to see and talk to who iam playing. I have played online with some friends and have done some really good shots that you want to be able to shout to your mate " look at that I killed the **** out of you" and other stuff like that. A LAN game is good and I know a few people who use the Microsoft voice chat so talk while playing games.
For me a multiplayer game like Quake 3 is very fun with a few mates around the TV playing. I did this with Goldeneye for the N64 and it becomes so addictive its all you can do. The fun is playing the game but also interacting with your mates is fun. If anyone plays on the PS2 and can get other people round quite often then these games are amazing as they offer so many laughs. I remember always using proximity mines for goldeneye as they were amazing, they are on Timesplitters and on Quake 3 as well.
> Others will no doubt disagree with me, but I don't see much point in
> picking up Quake 3 of UT when the playstation can't offer the online
> capability. Don't get me wrong, they're fun multiplayer games, but
> to me they're weak as 1 player games.
All you do is run around
> fragging the comp again and again and the satisfaction of it soon
> wears off. It would be so much better if they they had a storylined
> 1 player game to keep you busy, but really this is only worth buying
> if you have loads of friends to play it with. Cause if you have the
> same 3 friends over, that'll soon become repetitive too. The good
> thing about the online option on the Dreamcast was that you got to
> meet different people with different ways of playing and different
> levels of skill.
I really think it was a mistake for Sony to
> have these out before the PS2 gets its modem. I'm no fan of
> Timesplitters personally, but that is the kind of FPS game that
> keeps you busy along with the likes of Doom and Goldeneye. All had
> they're problem solving elements like collecting keys or having to
> do certain things while blasting your way through hordes of enemies.
> Then once your mates were over, you could goto the multiplayer and
> have a laugh on that. And thats really what Quake 3 and UT are, FPS
> with the main game taken out leaving just the multiplayer option.
>
I personally have played on Quake 3 and UT for the PC and didnt use it on the internet as
a) Didnt really want to spend time playing on the net
b)Copied games and sometimes they dont work for the online games.
I found the one player game to be fun, I could easily spend hours on the game. Also I spent hours on Timesplitters multiplayer using the Bots.
I think online gaming is good but I still like to see and talk to who iam playing. I have played online with some friends and have done some really good shots that you want to be able to shout to your mate " look at that I killed the **** out of you" and other stuff like that. A LAN game is good and I know a few people who use the Microsoft voice chat so talk while playing games.
For me a multiplayer game like Quake 3 is very fun with a few mates around the TV playing. I did this with Goldeneye for the N64 and it becomes so addictive its all you can do. The fun is playing the game but also interacting with your mates is fun. If anyone plays on the PS2 and can get other people round quite often then these games are amazing as they offer so many laughs. I remember always using proximity mines for goldeneye as they were amazing, they are on Timesplitters and on Quake 3 as well.
Page: