Viewing Thread:
"A round of applause for Arsenal."

Not losing a match in the league all season. Quite a feat no matter who you support.

*claps*

Bagz wrote:
> What about Sol Campbell?
> Sol Campbell, he is now known for the red cards he has collected,
> good player, not that crucial in the Arsenal team.

Please tell me you're joking. Arsenal have a superb defensive record, and that certainly isn't down to Lehmann. So who is it down to? Toure and Cambpell, the best central defense partnership in the Premiership if you ask me.

Lil Bro wrote:
> Take away Henry, they're nothing.

Take away Henry and they'd be aiming for a top four finish I am in no doubt. The contributions of players such as Cambpell, Toure, Pires and Viera are far underrated. Remember, Henry hasn't played every Premiership match this season, so they've had to live successfully without him before. You're just bitter that Tottenham could never get a manager as could as Mr. Wenger. ;-p

Ashman wrote:
> Bagz wrote:
> What about Sol Campbell?
> Sol Campbell, he is now known for the red cards he has collected,
> good player, not that crucial in the Arsenal team.
>
> Please tell me you're joking. Arsenal have a superb defensive record,
> and that certainly isn't down to Lehmann. So who is it down to? Toure
> and Cambpell, the best central defense partnership in the Premiership
> if you ask me.

Sol Campbell, the failure of the season. I think he was Arsenals worst buy!

I still think they'd be the best team in the country without Henry.

Rickoss wrote:
> I still think they'd be the best team in the country without Henry.

I think if Man Utd still had Beckham, that they would be the best!

Beckham was a great tactician and could see all the different possible outcomes of actions. He could also bring the team together to play fluently together like ARSEnal do now

Lil Bro wrote:
> Take away Henry, they're nothing.

They'd still be better than Spurs...

And pretty much every other team in the league as well.

I don't think they'd be the best just because of Beckham, but without him they have lost a lot.

It will be interesting to see if they have the motivation to retain the title next year, they havent done so far.

Bagz wrote:
> I think if Man Utd still had Beckham, that they would be the best!
>
> Beckham was a great tactician and could see all the different
> possible outcomes of actions. He could also bring the team together
> to play fluently together like ARSEnal do now

I'm just going to have a stab in the dark and guess that you are a Man United fan.

The Beckham angle is flawed by Real Madrid's pathetic season.

Yes, I'd rather have Beckham in the team as opposed to Fletcher, but it wouldnt have made that much difference.

Arsenal are not a one man team, but they would not have gone the whole season undefeated without Henry.