Viewing Thread:
"A round of applause for Arsenal."

Not losing a match in the league all season. Quite a feat no matter who you support.

*claps*

We should of had a penalty.

Nuff said.

Everyone seems to be in agreement with what I wrote about Henry, Pires, Campbell etc.

They wouldn't be nothing without Henry, but they wouldn't be Champions.

Its not that they dont have the players to be a good side. Its that they rely too much on him.

If you watch them play, you'll see Reyes make a defence-piercing run when Vieira has the ball, and all that he needs to do is slide it through and Reyes would have a one-on-on. But Arsenal just seem to pass the ball across the pitch to Henry standing like a donkey on the half-way line. *does retarded Henry impression.* Now all they need to do is pass it through, and Reyes would be scoring 30 a season....

Henry seems to do everything for the team because that's the way Arsenal play. If their play didn't rely so much on him, they'd probably get more of the credit that they deserve, for being one of the greatest teams in French...I mean English history.... :P

Well done Arsenal.

Bergkamp is a quality player. But having known the legend that is Gianfranco Zola, most other players just seem to fall short.

Has no-one actually been watching Arsenal? How can you go on about players like Reyes and Campbell when truely the guy that makes Arsenal tick is Dennis Bergkamp. His ability to slice teams apart with a single pass, amazing!!! It's just ashame that he is coming to the end of his career....

The only reason Beckham's absence was highlighted was because Fergie didn't bring anyone in to directly replace him. If he had then no one would even be mentioning that over-rated girly muppet.

The Beckham angle is flawed by Real Madrid's pathetic season.

Yes, I'd rather have Beckham in the team as opposed to Fletcher, but it wouldnt have made that much difference.

Arsenal are not a one man team, but they would not have gone the whole season undefeated without Henry.

Bagz wrote:
> I think if Man Utd still had Beckham, that they would be the best!
>
> Beckham was a great tactician and could see all the different
> possible outcomes of actions. He could also bring the team together
> to play fluently together like ARSEnal do now

I'm just going to have a stab in the dark and guess that you are a Man United fan.

It will be interesting to see if they have the motivation to retain the title next year, they havent done so far.

I don't think they'd be the best just because of Beckham, but without him they have lost a lot.

Lil Bro wrote:
> Take away Henry, they're nothing.

They'd still be better than Spurs...

And pretty much every other team in the league as well.