Viewing Thread:
"Robotic Chancellor of the exchequer and religion"

Gordon Brown is to be replaced by a Robot before the next election, to ensure that Labour are able to maximise the level of taxation they squeeze from us poor citizens of Europe. However early trials of the Robot: The Tax Barstard 3000 series, have shown there to be major flaws. The Robot copes well with assessing the level of VAT or income tax to levy but is seemingly random in allocating how much the Government can get for people's immoral acts. One person had to pay £40000 for Sloth, whilst another only £40 for Avarice. Another only had to fork out £20 for punching a monkey in the nuts at a kids party, and £5000000 for punching the Clown that came with it. All Clowns, of course, should be punched in the nuts, this is not a sin, it's an obligation.

The Robot is not expected to take over until its programme is patched in a bid to prevent these sin tax errors from occuring.

That was devastatingly... dodgy.

The sagacious one wrote:
> Monkey see, monkey do you, ...
*****

"Do, do, do the funky gibbon ..."

Etc.

Maximin the maximization of distributive justice

Timmargh wrote:
> That's a bit steep. Still, the price you pay for your urges, eh?

Monkey see, monkey do you, monkey still can look himself in face in morning. You pay the price.

That's a bit steep. Still, the price you pay for your urges, eh?

Timmargh wrote:
> What would be the price of slipping the monkey a length?

In Amsterdam, you can be rodgered by a Bonobo monkey for less than 15 euros, but if you want to be the pumpmaster, you are looking at 30. Therfore Sin tax is an extra 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 euros for being a doirty perv.

What would be the price of slipping the monkey a length?

:D

monkey_man wrote:
> Would the monkey get fined for biting the clown?

It would be entitled for a rebate if it was an act of charity.

Would the monkey get fined for biting the clown?