The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
There is a program on channel 4 at the moment talking about the subject.
Well, while we are all actually voyeurs, i.e. you see a nice looking female/male (by that I don’t mean a hermaphrodite), walking down the street in some tight jeans; you do turn and have another look.
But this program is showing the “hardcore” voyeurs. Now, I don’t mind people who are like-minded meeting up and watching each other, or taking pictures pretending that they don’t know, you know, fake voyeur, but this is showing how technology has impacted and now every 1 in 1000 women in the UK has probably been snapped in the nude.
Now, that may not sound like a large sum, but they are being snapped in places that are supposed to be private, dressing rooms and such. Also, just think, that 1 in 1000 could be your sister or mother or something.
What are your views on the whole thing?
Also, this is a family forum, but I think if handled maturely this subject can be discussed on here.
Well, while we are all actually voyeurs, i.e. you see a nice looking female/male (by that I don’t mean a hermaphrodite), walking down the street in some tight jeans; you do turn and have another look.
But this program is showing the “hardcore” voyeurs. Now, I don’t mind people who are like-minded meeting up and watching each other, or taking pictures pretending that they don’t know, you know, fake voyeur, but this is showing how technology has impacted and now every 1 in 1000 women in the UK has probably been snapped in the nude.
Now, that may not sound like a large sum, but they are being snapped in places that are supposed to be private, dressing rooms and such. Also, just think, that 1 in 1000 could be your sister or mother or something.
What are your views on the whole thing?
Also, this is a family forum, but I think if handled maturely this subject can be discussed on here.
Page:
Bless, Hedfix is a rabbit.
Flockhart wrote:
> Women looking at men = Deer looking at a lion
> Men looking at women = lion looking at deer
>
> That's the strangest analogy i've ever made
Heh. Well that's funny because I've been pounced upon by a deer before.
Not all women and men fit into the same snug little categories y'know.
> Women looking at men = Deer looking at a lion
> Men looking at women = lion looking at deer
>
> That's the strangest analogy i've ever made
Heh. Well that's funny because I've been pounced upon by a deer before.
Not all women and men fit into the same snug little categories y'know.
yeah, I've met many gorgeous women in martial arts classes. drop dead gorgeous. sure, they're toned, but not muscley. and they'd break your arms with relative ease.
tough doesn't necessarily mean muscley/big/ugly
tough doesn't necessarily mean muscley/big/ugly
They don't need to be muscley to beat you up.
There is such a thing as Martial Arts y'know.
There is such a thing as Martial Arts y'know.
I've never understood that, why would any want a girl who could beat them up, i'm not into tough girls ad i'm being horrendously sexist but i like girls to be girls, if i wanted someone muscly i'd become gay(dont start an arguement over that comment)
hmmm, being so interested in the martial arts, I can't help but wonder how cool it would be to have a girlfriend who could kick the crap out of anyone who gave me grief.
of course, my precious masculinity may be threatened - I'd soon fix that by making her fix me my tea.
of course, my precious masculinity may be threatened - I'd soon fix that by making her fix me my tea.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> but it makes perfect sense - in our world of politically correct
> crap, people are too quick to judge men and women on the same terms,
> which is ludicrous.
Men and women cant be treated the same because they are not, women are no threat to us, but we are always a potential threat to them because we are physically stronger, it's not nice but it is the truth, that not all men are as charming as us.
> but it makes perfect sense - in our world of politically correct
> crap, people are too quick to judge men and women on the same terms,
> which is ludicrous.
Men and women cant be treated the same because they are not, women are no threat to us, but we are always a potential threat to them because we are physically stronger, it's not nice but it is the truth, that not all men are as charming as us.
Not what teenie-weenie.com says
Flockhart wrote:
> I think the difference between it for men and woman is the predatory
> side, i've no problem with women looking at me because i'm not
> threatened by it, but i think it's obviously different for them
> because we are perceived as the hunters.
> In short
> Women looking at men = Deer looking at a lion
> Men looking at women = lion looking at deer
>
> That's the strangest analogy i've ever made
but it makes perfect sense - in our world of politically correct crap, people are too quick to judge men and women on the same terms, which is ludicrous.
> I think the difference between it for men and woman is the predatory
> side, i've no problem with women looking at me because i'm not
> threatened by it, but i think it's obviously different for them
> because we are perceived as the hunters.
> In short
> Women looking at men = Deer looking at a lion
> Men looking at women = lion looking at deer
>
> That's the strangest analogy i've ever made
but it makes perfect sense - in our world of politically correct crap, people are too quick to judge men and women on the same terms, which is ludicrous.
"When Borat was asked to perform this test, several redwoods were sacrificed aswell as a full box of pencils"
Page: