The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Can you check Special Observe to see if you got my profile update please? I'd rather check you have it first before sending another in.
Thanks
Thanks
Page:
Cub!st wrote:
> blah blah blah look at me trying to be all slyly threatening
The picture was in no way defamation of character. It was neither offensive nor slanderous, and it in no way put across false information concerning yourself.
And of course it isn't fecking on the DPA registrar, considering that;
A) It's a bit of light hearted fun.
B) We aren't an official company/organisation. Therefore, it is pointless.
Tada.
i'Azul wins again.
> blah blah blah look at me trying to be all slyly threatening
The picture was in no way defamation of character. It was neither offensive nor slanderous, and it in no way put across false information concerning yourself.
And of course it isn't fecking on the DPA registrar, considering that;
A) It's a bit of light hearted fun.
B) We aren't an official company/organisation. Therefore, it is pointless.
Tada.
i'Azul wins again.
Cub!st wrote:
Apart
> from anything else I don't have blonde hair.
*****
That can be rectified.
Apart
> from anything else I don't have blonde hair.
*****
That can be rectified.
Yes yes, I admit the picture is inaccurate...I should have put a Barbie doll in your hand instead of Action Man.
*Admits...then eats more pies*
*Admits...then eats more pies*
Mystique wrote:
> I would like to apologise for any hissy fits caused in the uploading
> of my drawing ...I just thought it was more a more acurate dipiction
> of how you actually looked than just some random picture you got from
> ladyboys.com
Hmm interesting theory. However haven not seen me before it does make me wonder what exactly you were basing that drawing on considering personality traits have little to do with physical appearance. Apart from anything else I don't have blonde hair.
> I would like to apologise for any hissy fits caused in the uploading
> of my drawing ...I just thought it was more a more acurate dipiction
> of how you actually looked than just some random picture you got from
> ladyboys.com
Hmm interesting theory. However haven not seen me before it does make me wonder what exactly you were basing that drawing on considering personality traits have little to do with physical appearance. Apart from anything else I don't have blonde hair.
Me = Bored
http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk (space) /eventual.aspx?id=690
This is exactly what I was referring to. I have the right to rectify all information that is flawed and inaccurate yet associated with me none the less. That picture was on my personal profile yet it was inaccurate information so I wished it to be changed. Although, out of interest, is Special Observe registered with the Data Protection Registrar?
This is exactly what I was referring to. I have the right to rectify all information that is flawed and inaccurate yet associated with me none the less. That picture was on my personal profile yet it was inaccurate information so I wished it to be changed. Although, out of interest, is Special Observe registered with the Data Protection Registrar?
I would like to apologise for any hissy fits caused in the uploading of my drawing ...I just thought it was more a more acurate dipiction of how you actually looked than just some random picture you got from ladyboys.com
*Apologises*....*Then eats all the pies*
*Apologises*....*Then eats all the pies*
Cub!st wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> I don't see why you can't simply say, "So when will it be
> done?"
>
> It'd save you visiting dictionary.com, y'know.
>
> I am recording all our conversations for reference so I am trying to
> talk in a calm and composed manner. Apparently by putting that
> picture up you are breaking a variety of laws
*Sniggers incoherently*
I know all about the Data Protection Act, you moron.
And seeing as how the data users were unbeknown to the fact that such data was inaccurate, there is nothing you can do to be honest.
"variety of laws"
Yes. Ie, 1.
And besides, I did it about 10 minutes ago, you fool.
And actually, seeing as how the picture involved here made no harm whatsoever, was not defamation of character, and was not providing false information - you're talking bull.
Thankyouverymuch.
*Bows*
> Azul wrote:
> I don't see why you can't simply say, "So when will it be
> done?"
>
> It'd save you visiting dictionary.com, y'know.
>
> I am recording all our conversations for reference so I am trying to
> talk in a calm and composed manner. Apparently by putting that
> picture up you are breaking a variety of laws
*Sniggers incoherently*
I know all about the Data Protection Act, you moron.
And seeing as how the data users were unbeknown to the fact that such data was inaccurate, there is nothing you can do to be honest.
"variety of laws"
Yes. Ie, 1.
And besides, I did it about 10 minutes ago, you fool.
And actually, seeing as how the picture involved here made no harm whatsoever, was not defamation of character, and was not providing false information - you're talking bull.
Thankyouverymuch.
*Bows*
Cub!st wrote:
> Apparently by putting that
> picture up you are breaking a variety of laws and I have the right to
> have my wishes followed. If you do not co-operate and I can prove
> that I have made my wishes clear. Then I can report the site. However
> I'd imagine you'd simply follow my wishes and make the necessary
> changes.
I bet you have a lawyer on speed dial and stuff.
> Apparently by putting that
> picture up you are breaking a variety of laws and I have the right to
> have my wishes followed. If you do not co-operate and I can prove
> that I have made my wishes clear. Then I can report the site. However
> I'd imagine you'd simply follow my wishes and make the necessary
> changes.
I bet you have a lawyer on speed dial and stuff.
Haha. Cubist is crap at life.
Page: