The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
whos your favorite snooker player as well ?
i don't watch it that much i only know a few faces but i enjoy watching it.
my favorite player would probaly be *edit* O'SULLIVAN *edit*, because his shots are quite smooth.
Secondly, balls balls balls.
Williams? The most watchable? Malteser? The most watchable? Rocket Ronnie? The most watchable?
AHHASHHDHHASDhHashdhhdasd
Please, don't make me laugh.
The most watchable are those with a light hearted personality. Those who are neither arrogant nor ignorant. Those who entertain the crowd as they play, with the odd touch of talking to the crowd.
Williams is undoubtedly the most sour faced moron in the sport. And he's Welsh, eh Edgy?
Ronnie is just sheer arrogant, as I already stated. It's near impossible to watch him in a match without at one point thinking, "What an arrogant son of a...". Take 2 years ago for example when, off the table, he was talking disrespectfully and disgracefully of Hendry.
You watch him play, and when he's down to the last ball, he's slams it, occasionally causing the black (or whatever it may be) to fly away.
He'll also slam his cue down onto to the table, which is pathetic considering how fragile the cloths are.
So in conclusion, you're an idiot. Fín.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> If you're watching Ronnie O'Sullivan, Tony Drago or Mark Williams
> you
> won't get bored.
>
> Ahahahahaha.
> Do you know anything about anything?
Do you? Those are the three most watchable players in snooker.
> If you're watching Ronnie O'Sullivan, Tony Drago or Mark Williams you
> won't get bored.
Ahahahahaha.
Do you know anything about anything?
I always expect to get bored quickly but never do. I'm not sure whether that's me underestimating my attention span or the game.
I'm a hardened pool player, but probably in no small part because I could never get to a snooker table when I was younger.
Ronnie was on phenominal form for the first 4 frames toady, but went off the boil a bit after the break.
If Hendry had been able to pull himself together he could so easily have gone at least 3-5 today. At 11-5 down it may have looked bad, but he'd at least have been just one good string of frames from touching distance.
If Ronnie doesn't bottle it the competition is his.
Still, some good entertainment for the spectators - the Ronnie show in one semi and a close tactical battle in the other.
GRRR.
> Azul wrote:
> I despise Ronnie O'Sullivan's fans. And Jimmy White's.
> There's a certain sense of, "We don't know much about snooker,
> but we'll scream them on anyway" about them.
>
> Ive followed Ronnie O'Sullivan since he started playing Snooker, met
> him a few a times and have a few of his signitures, decent guy and
> great to watch.
But you're a Man Utd fan. Therefore your opinion means nothing to me.
:-D
Nah, the way that towards the end of every fram when it's safe for him, he thumps it so arrogantly, and throws his cue down on the table etc.
It's pathetic.
> I despise Ronnie O'Sullivan's fans. And Jimmy White's.
> There's a certain sense of, "We don't know much about snooker,
> but we'll scream them on anyway" about them.
Ive followed Ronnie O'Sullivan since he started playing Snooker, met him a few a times and have a few of his signitures, decent guy and great to watch.
There's a certain sense of, "We don't know much about snooker, but we'll scream them on anyway" about them.
They're just arrogant. In my opinion, snooker isn't a game of screaming their names every single time they're going up to the table.
At important parts of important matches - yes. But not all the fecking time.
I also despise Ronnie himself. He's an arrogant SOB.
Tada. Fín.
And of course, come on Hendry. Without a shadow of a doubt.
And Dott too. It'd be great if he got to the final, though I also like Stevens.