Viewing Thread:
"i need advice on the gameaday competition"

hello

Cub!st wrote:
> I am trying the whole be nice
> part to all forum members who are nice to me but it's working very
> very slowly with lots of people still mad at me.

I'm not mad at you cubist, I just like taking the mick because you clearly think a lot of yourself.

that was bad and i even say mine are bad but that is a lot of rubbish

Aoe wrote:
> I still don't believe that you won fairly. You write some absolute
> poop reviews, then suddenly you come out with these two, well
> written, good reviews. It doesn't add up.

I was a tad suspiscous but I guess SR searched it.

"I still don't believe that you won fairly. You write some absolute poop reviews, then suddenly you come out with these two, well written, good reviews. It doesn't add up."


This is proving interesting. Can you suggest to us some examples so of this?

Incidently, i haven't won but i'm sure i write some "fantastic" reviews but i don't win. Why overshadowed or i'm not in the zone. A bit like rickross sometime ago and when he got it back, it was murder. Currently i'm waiting and working on other matters. Theres very few games i want currently and i'll be happy just to get all of them and i leave with my bounty. But alas, i must be a normal person and buy them.

CHEERS MATE

be§§ant™ wrote:
> i tryied winning a game for a game reveiw but i only ever win if its a
> reveiw on a mouse or a keyboard.
>
> i think they were effective because they make life easyier for you
> rather than add a zabbang to your life if you know what i is
> saying??
> zabbang is harder to make look good but making something look
> useful... easy!!
>
> basically look at the winners list read about 10 of them take aspects
> of there reveiws and apply them to yours, BINGO! try not to copy a
> good idea word for word try and make it diffeent.

I still don't believe that you won fairly. You write some absolute poop reviews, then suddenly you come out with these two, well written, good reviews. It doesn't add up.

it usually takes about 5-10 reveiws to get used to it and how to win.

forest fan is a diffrent case though he needs 200 reveiws.

It's certainly better than your previous reviews, it's structured a little better too. I would try to avoid giving anything a rating until the end of the review though, and try to remember; leave two spaces after a full stop, your review will look much better presented that way.

As I say though, the best bit of advice is to look at other GAD winning reviews and learn from them, but DON'T copy them, just try to learn your own style from what you see. If you copy any of the reviews SR will ban you.

Edgy wrote:
> Forest Fan, you're hardly an appropriate member to judge his reviews.

I knew someone would say that, just too bad it wasn't me........

todd wrote:
> thanks mate you the first person who has been nice to me

No problem, I like to help newbies whenever I can, well, those that I think deserve some help anyway. I saw your message in the other forum, I'll take a look at that True Crime review.