The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
public nudity? Just a question, that guy looked pretty shocked when he saw me toda...I'll be quiet now.
Page:
Cub!st wrote:
> ENlighten me E_B :)
Still committing offences though, aren't you?
> ENlighten me E_B :)
Still committing offences though, aren't you?
if you have a house on a public road and you stand in the window nude you could send any veiwers to court for spying on you. its a twisted world...
be§§ant™ wrote:
> if you have a house on a public road and you stand in the window nude
> you could send any veiwers to court for spying on you. its a twisted
> world...
You could be prosecuted yourself.
> if you have a house on a public road and you stand in the window nude
> you could send any veiwers to court for spying on you. its a twisted
> world...
You could be prosecuted yourself.
Azul wrote:
> Cub!st wrote:
> I'm still a consenting sexual partner though
>
> No, you're not.
16 is the legal age requirement to have sex though and I meet that requirement. The fact I consent to it is obvious so I fail to see your logic as for E_B. The only laws we've broken are ones regarding public nudity. I'd only rate our escapades certificate 15 though. A wibble bit o' m!nge.
> Cub!st wrote:
> I'm still a consenting sexual partner though
>
> No, you're not.
16 is the legal age requirement to have sex though and I meet that requirement. The fact I consent to it is obvious so I fail to see your logic as for E_B. The only laws we've broken are ones regarding public nudity. I'd only rate our escapades certificate 15 though. A wibble bit o' m!nge.
That's all very well and good.
But for it to actually have any relevance here, you'd need to be having sex. Which you're not.
But for it to actually have any relevance here, you'd need to be having sex. Which you're not.
You would be amazed at the number of offences there are
I want you to video this malarky 'next time'.
omg wtf lol wrote:
> I want you to video this malarky 'next time'.
If we can't afford a room what makes you think we can afford a camera?!?! and yes we make sure we don't get caught on CCTV.
> I want you to video this malarky 'next time'.
If we can't afford a room what makes you think we can afford a camera?!?! and yes we make sure we don't get caught on CCTV.
English_Bloke wrote:
> You would be amazed at the number of offences there are
Surprise me then Officer?
> You would be amazed at the number of offences there are
Surprise me then Officer?
Oh, at least 2 or 3.
Page: