The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1. Me
2. You
What do you think of the above people?
Put your review here about them people I mentioned above.
2. You
What do you think of the above people?
Put your review here about them people I mentioned above.
Page:
P4NT$ wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Because you will persist with asking stupid questions. Why else?
>
> If they are stupid then why answer them?
Because they weren't rhetorical questions and many people enjoy debating things. But I agree with you: this topic is now dead. Therefore, I am leaving it to die.
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Because you will persist with asking stupid questions. Why else?
>
> If they are stupid then why answer them?
Because they weren't rhetorical questions and many people enjoy debating things. But I agree with you: this topic is now dead. Therefore, I am leaving it to die.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Because you will persist with asking stupid questions. Why else?
If they are stupid then why answer them?
I expect this topic will DIE now, at last.
> Because you will persist with asking stupid questions. Why else?
If they are stupid then why answer them?
I expect this topic will DIE now, at last.
Because you will persist with asking stupid questions. Why else?
Der Nazi wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
>
> A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which
> flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
>
> That was clear from the start. If you hadn't noticed, people just
> entered this so that they could see what it was all about, and why it
> was started.
Then why did it take so long for an answer? Why is there an argument instead?
> P4NT$ wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
>
> A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which
> flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
>
> That was clear from the start. If you hadn't noticed, people just
> entered this so that they could see what it was all about, and why it
> was started.
Then why did it take so long for an answer? Why is there an argument instead?
P4NT$ wrote:
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
>
> A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which
> flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
That was clear from the start. If you hadn't noticed, people just entered this so that they could see what it was all about, and why it was started.
> Der Nazi wrote:
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
>
> A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which
> flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
That was clear from the start. If you hadn't noticed, people just entered this so that they could see what it was all about, and why it was started.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
> Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
A crap topic that you all fell into which had a simple answer, which flockhart found. Why did it take so long to see the solution?
Indeed.
Let's improve on that: A crap topic stared by a jerk.
What a crap topic.
1. Me - as in me - amazing.
2. You - as in you - dim.
2. You - as in you - dim.
Page: